Molecular Plant Breeding 2015, Vol.6, No.21, 1
        
        
          -
        
        
          17
        
        
        
          15
        
        
          Where 100 is the number of individuals tested and
        
        
          n
        
        
          is
        
        
          the number of contaminant individuals.
        
        
          Discriminance of contaminant individual genotypes
        
        
          from non-homozygous SSR loci
        
        
          As the discussion aforementioned, it is necessary to
        
        
          discriminate contaminant individual genotypes from
        
        
          non-homozygous SSR loci in assessments of seed
        
        
          purity and DUS of wheat variety using SSR marker.
        
        
          For clarity, the discriminance have to be reproduced
        
        
          here. To illustrate the distinction of the two phenomena,
        
        
          the 20 SSR loci genotypes of 30 individuals from the
        
        
          wheat variety WJ02 are presented in Table 5, which
        
        
          was given as an example in an article about the
        
        
          assessment of wheat seed purity (Wang et al., 2014b).
        
        
          At the 20 SSR loci, the genotypes of only six loci
        
        
          (
        
        
          Xgdm72
        
        
          ,
        
        
          Xcfd76
        
        
          ,
        
        
          Xksum62
        
        
          ,
        
        
          Xgwm304
        
        
          ,
        
        
          Xbarc198
        
        
          ,
        
        
          and
        
        
          Xcfa2028
        
        
          ) were uniform among individuals of
        
        
          WJ02. The genotypes at 14 loci differed among
        
        
          individuals. These results showed the presence of
        
        
          contaminants and non-homozygous SSR loci in WJ02.
        
        
          The genotypes at > 3 out of 20 loci of WJ02 individuals
        
        
          2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 27 differed from those of other
        
        
          individuals. These six individuals were considered to be
        
        
          contaminants according to the criteria aforementioned.
        
        
          After omitting the data for these six contaminant
        
        
          individuals, whether SSR loci are non-homozygous is
        
        
          readily estimated from the remaining data. The
        
        
          genotypes at 18 loci of 24 individuals were aa, with
        
        
          the exception of
        
        
          Xgwm294
        
        
          and
        
        
          Xcfd72
        
        
          . Three
        
        
          genotypes (aa, bb, and ab) were detected at
        
        
          gwm294
        
        
          .
        
        
          The numbers of individuals with the three genotypes
        
        
          were 19, 3, and 2, respectively. This locus was
        
        
          deemed to be a non-homozygous SSR locus due to
        
        
          distortion of allele distribution because χ
        
        
          2
        
        
          = 9.38 on
        
        
          the basis of the 1:1 goodness-of-fit test aforementioned,
        
        
          and thus
        
        
          gwm294
        
        
          was treated as a homozygous locus.
        
        
          Two genotypes (aa and bb) were detected at
        
        
          Xcfd72
        
        
          .
        
        
          The number of individuals with the two genotypes
        
        
          were 17 and 7 (χ
        
        
          2
        
        
          = 3.38). This locus was deemed to
        
        
          be a theoretical non-homozygous locus.
        
        
          Observation of morphological traits
        
        
          To determine the relationship between the SSR-HLR
        
        
          and the uniformity of the wheat varieties, the grains of
        
        
          individual plants of nearly 60 varieties with an
        
        
          SSR-HLR ≤ 95% from the national winter wheat
        
        
          regional trials in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were harvested,
        
        
          and were then grown by the plant-to-row method in
        
        
          the following years (2008-2009, 2009-2010 and
        
        
          2010-2011). The phenotypic and agronomic traits
        
        
          were compared among different rows of a variety. If
        
        
          the rows of a variety were distinct from each other,
        
        
          according to the criteria in Table 6, it indicated that
        
        
          the variety was still segregating and was not uniform.
        
        
          Concurrently, 10-20 varieties with an SSR-HLR >
        
        
          95% were grown in blocks. Phenotypic and
        
        
          agronomic traits were then compared among different
        
        
          individuals of a variety. 30 to 50 individuals were
        
        
          sampled from each row or block to investigate the
        
        
          phenotypic and agronomic traits listed in Table 6.
        
        
          Calculation of genetic similarity coefficient
        
        
          In this paper, the GS was used to evaluate the
        
        
          similarity between two plants. The GS between two
        
        
          plants is close to 1.0 if they share the same genotype.
        
        
          When two plants were scored as having the same
        
        
          genotype at a locus, the locus was increased by 1 as
        
        
          the numerator of the formula for calculating GS. For a
        
        
          heterozygous locus in a plant, 0.5 was added as the
        
        
          numerator if its genotype for one allele was the same
        
        
          as the homozygous genotype at the same locus of
        
        
          another plant. For example, the SSR locus
        
        
          Xgwm294
        
        
          of plant 18 and 19 of variety WJ02 is homozygous and
        
        
          heterozygous, respectively (Table 5), therefore 0.5
        
        
          was added as the numerator of the formula for
        
        
          calculating GS because the genotype of one allele of
        
        
          plant 19 is the same as that of plant 18. Moreover, if a
        
        
          locus for two plants was heterozygous, and the genotypes
        
        
          for one allele were the same but those for another
        
        
          allele differed between the two plants, 0.5 was added
        
        
          also as the numerator because one allelic genotype
        
        
          differed between the two plants. The numerator was
        
        
          divided by the total number of loci compared between
        
        
          two plants.
        
        
          The formula for calculating GS was:
        
        
          Where
        
        
          x
        
        
          is the number of loci with the same genotype
        
        
          between two plants,
        
        
          n
        
        
          is the number of loci compared
        
        
          between the two plants, and 1 is a correction value
        
        
          owing to the limited number of markers tested.