Molecular Plant Breeding 2016, Vol.7, No.12, 1
-
19
19
5
TGW
3
35
03M36.3-03
M33.1
h
qGL
-3
3
255
03M6.79-RM
14391
5.46 54.30
-2.8
51
3.223
-0.64
86
0.71
82
-4.59
78
3.40
13
-3.080
4
5
TGW
3
235
03M10.75-03
M6.79
5
40
05M10.24-R
M17836
5.03 49.55
2.87
98
-4.539
7
0.781
8
-0.55
8
-3.05
31
-2.01
93
4.340
9
5
TGW
3
250
03M6.79-RM
14391
7
45
RM21309-07
M20.11
6.65 64.09
3.03
18
-2.364
5
-8.53
48
-6.06
51
-2.69
47
-3.23
87
0.476
4
5
TGW
2
55
RM12678-M
05076
10
40
M095-10M12
.66
5.03 25.18
-2.4
86
1.330
3
-3.47
03
-4.30
23
-3.13
31
4.04
8
-0.962
2
5
TGW
2
100
M05076-02M
11.16
11
65
M101-11M11
.16
5.40 57.11
-3.7
91
-0.588
3
-3.79
01
-4.02
06
4.903
1
3.96
78
-0.85
5
TGW
3
235
03M10.75-03
M6.79
11
85
11M11.16-11
M20.77
5.54 45.69
1.92
1
-3.613
5
-5.81
51
-1.93
18
-4.45
11
-0.39
55
4.338
3
Note:
a
Main effect QTLs, identified at the threshold of LOD≥2.5 in this study, involve in degenic interaction for the variation of rice grain size related traits;
b
The percentage of phenotypic
variation of epistatic QTL explained;
c
The additive effects of epistatic QTLs at position 1 and 2, respectively;
d
The dominant effects of epistatic QTLs at postition 1 and 2, respectively;
e
The
epistatic effects of two QTL positions in additive×additive model;
f
The epistatic effects of two QTL positions in additive ×dominant model;
g
The epistatic effects of two QTL positions in
domanint×additive model;
h
The epistatic effects of two QTL positions in domanint ×dominant model.
