International Journal of Horticulture, 2017, Vol.7, No.28, 250-261
255
Table 3 Efficacy of Flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame 480 SC) against fruit borer,
Diaphania indica
damage and its effect on marketable fruit yield in Gherkin (1
st
season)
Tr.
No.
Treatment
Dosage
Pre-treatment count
(1 DBS)
Post-treatment counts (% fruit damage)
% protection over
UTC
Marketable
fruit yield
(t/ha)
(g a.i./ha) Forml./ha (ml)
After II Spray
After III Spray
5 DAS
10 DAS
5 DAS 10 DAS
T
1
Flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame 480 SC)
24
50
22.2
(28.1)
19.3
(26.1)
18.3
(25.3)
14.3
(22.2)
8.3
(16.7)
76.8
8.52
T
2
Flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame 480 SC) 36
75
20.7
(27.1)
17.4
(24.7)
16.5
(24.0)
10.2
(18.6)
6.7
(15.0)
81.2
8.66
T
3
Flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame 480 SC) 48
100
18.3
(25.2)
14.2
(22.1)
12.7
(20.9)
8.3
(16.7)
5.4
(13.4)
84.9
8.87
T
4
Flubendiamide 480 SC (Fame 480 SC) 60
125
16.4
(23.9)
11.3
(19.6)
10.7
(19.1)
6.2
(14.4)
3.1
(10.1)
91.3
10.45
T
5
Indoxacarb 14.5 SL
21.75
150
17.5
(24.8)
12.4
(20.6)
11.5
(19.8)
6.7
(15.0)
3.4
(10.6)
90.5
10.24
T
6
Lambda Cyhalothrin 5 EC
18.75
375
24.3
(29.5)
20.4
(26.9)
18.4
(25.4)
15.2
(22.9)
8.4
(16.8)
76.5
8.74
T
7
Untreated check (UTC)
-
-
30.4
(33.4)
32.5
34.8)
33.7
(35.5)
34.0
(35.7)
35.7
(36.7)
-
6.25
S.Em.±
-
-
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.7
1.0
-
0.51
C.D. (0.05)
-
-
1.2
2.1
1.5
2.1
3.0
-
1.51
C.V. (%)
-
-
12.4
14.6
12.8
16.5
15.4
-
12.41
Note: DBS = Day before spray, DAS = Days after spray, Figures in the parentheses are arc sine transformations
