Legume Genomics and Genetics 2015, Vol.6, No.4, 1-7
          
        
        
        
          6
        
        
          Meha/ DMS 01-34-2. These findings agreed with the
        
        
          reports of Singh et al. (2006), Aliyu et al. (2007) and
        
        
          Khodambashi et al. (2012) for most of the traits. The
        
        
          duplicate type of epistasis interaction generally hinders
        
        
          the improvement by practicing the selection. Hence,
        
        
          higher magnitude of duplicate type of interaction effect
        
        
          would not be desirable. It may give promising lines for
        
        
          respective traits when selection should be made in
        
        
          delayed after several generations of selection through
        
        
          single seed decent (SSD) till fixation for accumulating
        
        
          the favourable genes. The biparental approach is
        
        
          suggested for the exploitation of these important
        
        
          complex inherited agro-morphological traits to
        
        
          recover/ develop the high yielding mungbean. Besides,
        
        
          NMS exhibited [h] gene effect in both crosses,
        
        
          indicating the dominance gene action in governing
        
        
          NMS, may helpful through recombination breeding for
        
        
          mungbean improvement. NSP in Meha/ DMS 03-17-2
        
        
          and NSBP in Meha/ DMS 01-34-2 exhibited [d] gene
        
        
          effect, indicating the additive gene action in governing,
        
        
          may give transgressive segregants in early generations.
        
        
          Spreading growth habit was found dominant over
        
        
          erect in both crosses (Table 4). F
        
        
          2
        
        
          and back cross
        
        
          population score also fit the expected 3: 1 and 1:1,
        
        
          respectively for growth habit, indicating that these
        
        
          traits are under the monogenic control and could be
        
        
          easily exploited in mungbean improvement progr-
        
        
          amme. Similar findings were also observed earlier by
        
        
          Khattak et al. (1999) and Sriphadet et al. (2010).
        
        
          It is observed that the inheritance of yield and its
        
        
          component traits is too much complex and gene action
        
        
          is highly influence by type of genetic/ breeding
        
        
          material used to develop the crosses. The present
        
        
          study suggests the biparental mating and/ or diallel
        
        
          selective mating might be rewarding for mungbean
        
        
          improvement. The monogenic inheritance of growth
        
        
          habit indicated that possibility to develop the ideal
        
        
          plant type for high yield from developed population.
        
        
          
            3 Materials and Methods
          
        
        
          Genetics of some important agro-morphological traits
        
        
          of mungbean were studied using the F
        
        
          1
        
        
          , F
        
        
          2
        
        
          , BC
        
        
          1.1
        
        
          and
        
        
          BC
        
        
          1.2
        
        
          of a cross between Meha
        
        
          (spreading growth
        
        
          habit) as female parent (P
        
        
          1
        
        
          ) and DMS 03-17-2 and
        
        
          DMS 01-34-2 (erect growth habit) as male parent (P
        
        
          2
        
        
          ).
        
        
          The parents were selected from previous experiment
        
        
          (Singh et al.,
        
        
          2013) and crossed in to obtain the
        
        
          crosses during
        
        
          
            kharif,
          
        
        
          2012. The F
        
        
          1
        
        
          seeds were
        
        
          subjected to back crossing and selfing during
        
        
          
            summer,
          
        
        
          2013. These six basic generations were sown in
        
        
          randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three
        
        
          replications during
        
        
          
            kharif,
          
        
        
          2013. 10 competitive
        
        
          random plants from P
        
        
          1
        
        
          , P
        
        
          2
        
        
          & F
        
        
          1
        
        
          ; 15 plants from BC
        
        
          1:1
        
        
          & BC
        
        
          1:2
        
        
          ; 60 plants from F
        
        
          2
        
        
          population were randomly
        
        
          selected from each family in each replications, to
        
        
          record the observations for agro-morphological traits
        
        
          
            viz.,
          
        
        
          plant height (PH), number of primary branches
        
        
          per plant (NPBP), number of secondary branches per
        
        
          plant (NSBP), number of pods per plant (NPP), pod
        
        
          length (PL), number of seeds per pod (NSP), seed
        
        
          index (SI), biological yield per plant (BYP), harvest
        
        
          index (HI) and seed yield per plant (SYP). The traits
        
        
          
            viz.,
          
        
        
          days to first flower open (DFFO) and days to
        
        
          maturity (DM) were computed on plot basis.
        
        
          Table 4: Segregation ratio for growth habit in two mungbean crosses
        
        
          Population
        
        
          Total
        
        
          Spreading
        
        
          Erect
        
        
          Observed
        
        
          Expected
        
        
          χ2
        
        
          Meha
        
        
          62
        
        
          62
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          DMS 03-17-2
        
        
          60
        
        
          0
        
        
          60
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          F
        
        
          1
        
        
          57
        
        
          57
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          F
        
        
          2
        
        
          1034
        
        
          773
        
        
          261
        
        
          2.96:1
        
        
          3:1
        
        
          0.03
        
        
          B
        
        
          1:1
        
        
          64
        
        
          31
        
        
          33
        
        
          0.93:1
        
        
          1:1
        
        
          0.06
        
        
          B
        
        
          1:2
        
        
          59
        
        
          59
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          Meha
        
        
          64
        
        
          64
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          DMS 01-34-2
        
        
          60
        
        
          0
        
        
          60
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          F
        
        
          1
        
        
          53
        
        
          53
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          F
        
        
          2
        
        
          864
        
        
          659
        
        
          205
        
        
          3.21:1
        
        
          3:1
        
        
          0.75
        
        
          B
        
        
          1:1
        
        
          68
        
        
          33
        
        
          35
        
        
          0.94:1
        
        
          1:1
        
        
          0.06
        
        
          B
        
        
          1:2
        
        
          57
        
        
          57
        
        
          0
        
        
          --
        
        
          --
        
        
          --