Bt Research 2024, Vol.15, No.4, 164-173 http://microbescipublisher.com/index.php/bt 170 7 Concluding Remarks The review of literature on risk communication strategies for Bt-based public health interventions highlights several critical elements for effective communication. Effective public health messaging is characterized by delivery from credible sources, community engagement, and increasing awareness and knowledge, which are essential for managing risks and preventing infectious diseases. Multi-media approaches and printed materials combining text and diagrams are more effective than single media approaches. Additionally, integrating social science intelligence into epidemiologic risk assessments and strengthening multisectoral collaboration are crucial for improving risk communication. Trust in information sources, such as the WHO, significantly influences public adherence to preventive measures. Effective risk communication is paramount in public health interventions as it fosters public trust, compliance, and support for non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). It is essential for managing public perceptions and behaviors during health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Effective communication strategies can mitigate misinformation, enhance public understanding of health threats, and promote social responsibility and personal control. Moreover, integrating emergency risk communication (ERC) into public health systems ensures timely and accurate information dissemination, which is vital for preparedness and response activities. Stakeholders should prioritize engaging communities in the development of public health messages to ensure they are acceptable and increase understanding and perceived susceptibility to health threats. It is recommended to address uncertainty immediately and with transparency to build and maintain public trust. Utilizing a multi-media approach and combining different types of information in printed materials can enhance the effectiveness of communication strategies. Strengthening multisectoral collaboration, including with local organizations, is essential for a cohesive and comprehensive risk communication strategy. Regular feedback from the public on their familiarity and compliance with preventive measures should be sought to adapt and improve communication strategies as the situation evolves. Finally, stakeholders should ensure that risk communication strategies are proactive, participatory, and multisectoral to facilitate better governance and collaboration. Acknowledgments The authors extend sincere thanks to two anonymous peer reviewers for their feedback and suggestions on the manuscript. Conflict of Interest Disclosure The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. References Arije O., Udoh E., Ijadunola K., Afolabi O., Aransiola J., Omoregie G., Tomori-Adeleye O., Ukeme-Edet O., Fajemisin O., Titus R., and Onayade A., 2023, Combination prevention package of interventions for reducing vulnerability to HIV among adolescent girls and young women in Nigeria: an action research, PLoS ONE, 18(1): e0279077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279077 Brehaut J., Colquhoun H., Eva K., Carroll K., Sales A., Michie S., Ivers N., and Grimshaw J., 2016, Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness, Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(6): 435-441. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2248 Coyle M., and Gillies K., 2020, A systematic review of risk communication in clinical trials: How does it influence decisions to participate and what are the best methods to improve understanding in a trial context? PLoS ONE, 15(11): e0242239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242239 Dascalu S., Flammer P., Ghafari M., Henson S., Nascimento R., and Bonsall M., 2021, Engaging religious institutions and faith-based communities in public health initiatives: a case study of the Romanian Orthodox Church during the COVID-19 pandemic, Frontiers in Public Health, 9: 768091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.768091 Dickmann P., Bhatiasevi A., Chaib F., Baggio O., Banluta C., Hollenweger L., and Maaroufi A., 2016, Biological risks to public health: lessons from an international conference to inform the development of national risk communication strategies, Health Security, 14(6): 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0050 Dickmann P., McClelland A., Gamhewage G., Souza P., and Apfel F., 2015, Making sense of communication interventions in public health emergencies-an evaluation framework for risk communication, Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8(3): 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2015.1101962
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==