Bt Research 2024, Vol.15, No.2, 87-95 http://microbescipublisher.com/index.php/bt 92 6.3 Integrated pest management (IPM) approaches Integrating Bt crops into broader IPM strategies can enhance their effectiveness and sustainability while minimizing non-target impacts. Key components of IPM includethe utilizing natural predators and parasitoids to control pest populations can complement the use of Bt crops. Studies have shown that Bt crops can support conservation biological control by reducing the need for chemical insecticides, which are more harmful to non-target species (Duan et al., 2009; Romeis et al., 2019). Regular monitoring of pest and non-target organism populations can help in making informed decisions about pest management interventions. Implementing action thresholds ensures that control measures are only applied when necessary, reducing unnecessary exposure to Bt toxins (Naranjo, 2014; Romeis et al., 2019). Employing cultural practices such as crop rotation, intercropping, and maintaining habitat diversity can enhance the resilience of agroecosystems and reduce reliance on Bt crops alone for pest control (Kota et al., 1999; Naranjo, 2014; Romeis et al., 2019). By adopting these mitigation and management strategies, the ecological impact of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates can be minimized, promoting a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to pest management. 7 Regulatory and Policy Considerations 7.1 International regulatory frameworks The international regulatory frameworks for Bt crops are designed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these genetically modified organisms (GMOs) before they are approved for commercial use. Regulatory bodies such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) play crucial roles in the risk assessment and approval processes. These frameworks typically involve rigorous evaluations of the potential environmental and health impacts of Bt crops, including their effects on non-target invertebrates. For instance, the biosafety assessment protocols often include laboratory and field studies to evaluate the ecological risks associated with Bt crops (Marvier et al., 2007; Duan et al., 2009; Kostov et al., 2014). 7.2 Risk assessment rrotocols Risk assessment protocols for Bt crops involve a tiered approach that starts with laboratory studies and progresses to field trials. Laboratory studies often expose non-target organisms to high doses of Bt proteins to detect any harmful effects, which are then compared with field study results to validate the findings. This approach helps in understanding the potential risks and ensuring that laboratory results are consistent with field observations (Duan et al., 2009; Dang et al., 2017). Meta-analyses and systematic studies are also employed to synthesize data from multiple studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the ecological impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates ((Marvier et al., 2007; Krogh et al., 2020; Belousova et al., 2021). These protocols are essential for identifying any unintended effects on beneficial insects, soil organisms, and other non-target species, thereby informing regulatory decisions and ensuring environmental safety. 7.3 Public perception and acceptance Public perception and acceptance of Bt crops are influenced by various factors, including the perceived benefits and risks, media coverage, and the transparency of regulatory processes. The ongoing debate about the ecological and environmental risks of Bt crops, particularly their impact on non-target invertebrates, has led to mixed public opinions. While some studies have shown no significant harmful effects on non-target organisms, others have raised concerns about potential long-term impacts (Lagadic et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017; Belousova et al., 2021). Effective communication of scientific findings and regulatory decisions is crucial for gaining public trust and acceptance. Engaging stakeholders, including farmers, consumers, and environmental groups, in the decision-making process can also help address concerns and improve the acceptance of Bt crops (Lagadic et al., 2016). 8 Concluding Remarks The ecological impact of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops on non-target invertebrates has been extensively studied, with mixed results. Meta-analyses and systematic studies indicate that non-target invertebrates are generally more abundant in Bt crop fields compared to non-transgenic fields managed with insecticides, but less
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==