International Journal of Clinical Case Reports, 2025, Vol.15, No.1, 34-43 http://medscipublisher.com/index.php/ijccr 37 4.3 Standardized assessment tools and scoring systems Standardized assessment tools and scoring systems are integral to the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction, providing a structured approach to quantify symptoms and their impact on quality of life. Instruments like the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire are commonly used to assess the severity of symptoms such as urinary distress, colorectal distress, and pelvic organ prolapse dysfunction (Lakomy et al., 2022). These tools facilitate the comparison of patient-reported outcomes across different treatment modalities and help in monitoring the effectiveness of interventions over time. The use of validated questionnaires, such as the Urinary Distress Inventory-6 and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, allows for a comprehensive assessment of the impact of PFD on patients' daily lives. These scoring systems are crucial for both clinical practice and research, as they provide a standardized method for evaluating treatment outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making (White and Rose, 2023). By employing these tools, healthcare providers can better understand the multifaceted nature of PFD and develop personalized management plans that address the specific needs of each patient. 5 Current Treatment Strategies for Post-Surgical PFD 5.1 Non-surgical approaches Non-surgical approaches to managing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD) after gynecological malignancy surgery primarily focus on physical therapy, biofeedback, and medication. Physical therapy, particularly pelvic floor muscle training, has shown moderate evidence of improving sexual function and health-related quality of life in survivors of gynecological cancer. This includes interventions such as counseling, yoga, and core exercises, which have been beneficial for cervical cancer survivors (Brennen et al., 2020). Additionally, multimodal pelvic floor physical therapy, which combines education, manual therapy, and exercises, has been effective in reducing pain and improving sexual function and quality of life in survivors suffering from dyspareunia (Cyr et al., 2020; Cyr et al., 2022). Biofeedback is another non-surgical intervention that can be integrated into pelvic floor rehabilitation. It helps patients gain awareness and control over their pelvic floor muscles, which can be particularly beneficial in managing symptoms of urinary incontinence and other PFDs. Medications may also be used to manage specific symptoms of PFD, such as urinary incontinence, although the evidence for pharmacological interventions is less robust compared to physical therapy and biofeedback (Ramaseshan et al., 2017). 5.2 Minimally invasive interventions Minimally invasive interventions offer alternative strategies for managing PFD in patients who may not respond to conservative treatments. Botox injections can be used to alleviate symptoms of overactive bladder and urinary incontinence by relaxing the bladder muscles, although this approach requires further research to establish its efficacy in post-surgical PFD cases. Pessaries, which are devices inserted into the vagina to support pelvic organs, can be effective in managing pelvic organ prolapse and associated symptoms, providing a non-surgical option for patients (Bretschneider et al., 2018). Nerve stimulation, such as sacral nerve stimulation, is another minimally invasive technique that can help manage urinary and fecal incontinence by modulating nerve signals to the pelvic floor muscles. This approach has shown promise in improving symptoms and quality of life for patients with PFD (Gleason, 2021). However, the application of these minimally invasive interventions specifically in the context of post-gynecological cancer surgery requires more targeted research to confirm their effectiveness and safety. 5.3 Surgical interventions for severe cases For severe cases of PFD that do not respond to conservative or minimally invasive treatments, surgical interventions may be necessary. Mesh implants are used in pelvic organ prolapse repairs to provide additional support to weakened pelvic tissues. However, the use of mesh has been associated with complications, and its application must be carefully considered (Bretschneider et al., 2018). Sling procedures, which involve placing a supportive sling around the urethra, are commonly used to treat stress urinary incontinence and have shown effectiveness in improving continence (Huffman et al., 2016).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==