International Journal of Horticulture, 2025, Vol.15, No.2, 73-79 http://hortherbpublisher.com/index.php/ijh 77 6). These differences were not statistically significant, and the grand mean was 13.75, as shown in similar results reported by Singh et al. (2022).” Table 4 Pod length (cm) of different varieties of okra Treatment Pod length (cm) of different varieties of okra from 60 DAS 60DAS 75DAS 90DAS Arka Anamika 13.67b 12.67a 13.50bc Rukmani 15.25c 12.42b 14.08c Raja 12.17a 11.34b 11.75a Special-45 13.42b 12.92b 3.08b Arzine 14.58bc 13.00b 13.50bc LSD(0.05) 1.11 0.94 0.87 F-test *** ** ** SEm(±) 0.36 0.43 0.28 CV(%) 5.2 4.9 4.3 GrandMean 13.80 12.47 13.18 Note: *Significant at 5% level of significance, **Significant at 1% level of significance, ***Significant at 0.1% level of significance, LSD: least significant difference, SEm: Standard error of the mean, CV: coefficient of difference, DAS: Days After Sowing Table 5 Average pod number of different varieties of okra Treatments Average pod number of different varieties of okra at 90 DAS Arka Anamika 5.50b Rukmani 5.50b Raja 4.00a Special-45 4.00a Arzine 4.75ab LSD 0.86 F-test ** SEm(±) 0.28 CV(%) 11.8 GrandMean 4.75 Note: *Significant at 5% level of significance, **Significant at 1% level of significance, ***Significant at 0.1% level of significance, LSD: least significant difference, SEm: Standard error of the mean, CV: coefficient of difference, DAS: Days After Sowing Table 6 Average pod weight of different varieties of okra Treatment Average pod weight of different varieties of okra at 90 DAS Arka Anamika 13.75 Rukmani 14.50 Raja 13.00 Special-45 13.00 Arzine 14.50 LSD 1.47 F-test NS SEm(±) 0.47 CV(%) 7.0 GrandMean 13.75 Note: LSD: least significant difference, SEm: Standard error of the mean, CV: coefficient of difference, DAS: Days After Sowing
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==