International Journal of Horticulture, 2024, Vol.14, No.4, 263-274 http://hortherbpublisher.com/index.php/ijh 270 et al., 2019). Additionally, the use of marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) can enhance the efficiency of breeding programs by incorporating genetic information and environmental interactions into the selection process (Collins et al., 2018; Simko et al., 2021). Understanding the genetic variability, environmental impacts, and their interactions is essential for the successful breeding of high-yield and disease-resistant carrot varieties. By leveraging genetic diversity and employing advanced breeding techniques, it is possible to develop carrot cultivars that perform well under various environmental conditions and meet the demands of both growers and consumers. 6 Analytical Techniques for Carrot Breeding 6.1 Genomic analysis in carrot breeding Genomic analysis plays a crucial role in carrot breeding by enabling the identification and utilization of genetic markers associated with desirable traits such as high yield and disease resistance. Advances in molecular biology, including high-throughput sequencing and genome editing, have significantly accelerated the development of new carrot cultivars. Techniques such as transcriptomics, association mapping, and allele mining are employed to identify functional markers (FMs) that are closely linked to phenotypic traits, thereby enhancing the efficiency of marker-assisted selection (MAS) (Salgotra and Stewart, 2020). The development of high-quality genome references and pangenome assemblies further supports the identification of disease resistance genes and other agronomic traits, facilitating the breeding of superior carrot varieties (Amas et al., 2022). 6.2 Phenotypic analysis methods Phenotypic analysis remains a fundamental component of carrot breeding, providing essential data on the expression of traits under various environmental conditions. Traditional phenotypic selection involves evaluating traits such as yield, disease resistance, and quality across multiple generations and locations to account for genotype-environment interactions (Boopathi, 2020). However, phenotypic selection alone can be time-consuming and less precise due to environmental influences. Integrating phenotypic data with molecular markers through MAS can improve the accuracy and efficiency of selecting desirable traits (Vagndorf et al., 2018). For instance, phenotypic determination of disease resistance through natural and artificial infection, combined with the presence/absence of specific resistance genes, has been effectively used in breeding programs (Beketova et al., 2021). 6.3 Bioinformatics tools in MAS Bioinformatics tools are indispensable in the application of MAS for carrot breeding. These tools facilitate the analysis and interpretation of large genomic datasets, enabling the identification of genetic markers associated with key traits. High-throughput sequencing technologies and SNP genotyping platforms have revolutionized crop improvement programs by providing detailed insights into the genetic architecture of crops (Tiwari et al., 2022). Bioinformatics techniques such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) are used to identify SNP markers linked to phenotypic variation, expediting the breeding process. Additionally, the integration of machine learning and high-throughput phenotyping can further enhance the predictive accuracy of genomic selection models, accelerating the development of high-yield and disease-resistant carrot varieties (Sandhu et al., 2022). 7 Challenges and Opportunities 7.1 Technical challenges in MAS Marker-assisted selection (MAS) has revolutionized plant breeding by enabling the selection of desirable traits at the genetic level. However, several technical challenges persist. One significant challenge is the complexity of traits controlled by multiple genes, which makes it difficult to identify and select the appropriate markers. For instance, while MAS is highly effective for traits controlled by one or a few genes, its efficiency diminishes for polygenic traits where genomic selection (GS) might be more suitable (Collins et al., 2018).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==