International Journal of Horticulture, 2024, Vol.14, No.3, 175-185 http://hortherbpublisher.com/index.php/ijh 183 Table 6 Effect of different concentrations of salicylic acid on pulp PH of mango (Mangifera indica L.cv. Bombay green) in Bardibas, Mahottari, 2023 Treatments PulpPH Initial 3DAS 6DAS 9DAS 12DAS 15DAS Control 4.6 5.18a 5.77a 6.25a - - 50 ppmSA 4.6 5.06a 5.47b 5.85b 6.95a - 100 ppm SA 4.6 4.84b 5.25c 5.57c 6.67b 6.85a 150 ppm SA 4.6 4.77b 4.97d 5.35c 6.05c 6.27b 200 ppm SA 4.6 4.75b 4.85d 5.32c 5.85c 6.00b Grandmean 4.6 4.92 5.26 5.67 6.38 6.37 CV% - 2.1 2.3 3.2 2.6 2.8 SEM(±) - 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 LSD - 0.15 0.18 0.26 0.25 0.28 F-value - *** *** *** *** *** Notes: Treatment means in a column with same letters are not significantly different (p=0.05) according to DMRT at 5% level of significance, CV = Coefficient of Variation, LSD = Least Significant Difference, SEM (±) = Standard Errors of Means, DAS= Days after Storage, * = significantly different at (p<0.05), ** = highly significant different at (p<0.01), *** = very significantly different at (p<0.001) Figure 6 Post-harvest treatments of salicylic acid on pulp PH of mango Table 7 Effect of different concentrations of salicylic acid on the shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L.cv. Bombay green) in Bardibas, Mahottari, 2023 Treatments Shelf life Control 9.27c 50 ppmSA 12.25b 100 ppmSA 15.22a 150 ppmSA 15.35a 200 ppmSA 15.71a Grandmean 13.56 CV% 9.3 SEM(±) 0.62 LSD 1.89 F-value <0.001*** Notes: Treatment means in a column with same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT at 5% level of significance, CV = Coefficient of Variation, LSD = Least Significant Difference, SEM (±) = Standard Errors of Means, DAS=Days after Storage, * = significantly different at (p<0.05), ** = highly significant different at (p<0.01), *** = very significantly different at (p<0.001)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==