Plant Gene and Traits 2024, Vol.15, No.4, 207-219 http://genbreedpublisher.com/index.php/pgt 214 CRISPR-Cas9, in particular, has been widely adopted due to its simplicity, efficiency, and versatility. It has been successfully applied to various crops to enhance traits such as abiotic stress tolerance and disease resistance (Jaganathan et al., 2018; Thudi et al., 2020; Nascimento et al., 2023). For instance, CRISPR-Cas9 has been used to edit genes in Camelina sativa to alter its fatty acid content, demonstrating the potential of genome editing in modifying complex traits in polyploid plants (Kawall, 2021). The integration of these advanced biotechnological tools in Camellia breeding could significantly accelerate the development of improved varieties with enhanced economic and agronomic traits. 8.2 Enhancing stress resistance and yield inCamellia through biotechnological approaches Biotechnological approaches, including genomic selection and genome editing, have shown great promise in enhancing stress resistance and yield in crops. By leveraging genomic resources and high-throughput genotyping, researchers can identify and select for alleles associated with desirable traits such as drought tolerance, heat resistance, and high yield potential (Dwivedi et al., 2017; Thudi et al., 2020). For example, the use of CRISPR-Cas9 has enabled the development of crop varieties with improved tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses, such as salinity and temperature extremes, by targeting specific genes involved in stress response pathways (Jaganathan et al., 2018; Nascimento et al., 2023). In Camellia, the application of these biotechnological tools could lead to the identification and manipulation of key genes responsible for stress tolerance and yield, thereby improving the resilience and productivity of Camellia species under changing environmental conditions (Yan et al., 2018; Ye et al., 2023). 8.3 Ethical considerations and regulatory challenges in deploying biotechnology inCamellia breeding The deployment of biotechnological tools in plant breeding, including genetic engineering and genome editing, raises several ethical considerations and regulatory challenges. One major concern is the potential unintended effects of genome editing on non-target genes and the broader ecosystem. For instance, alterations in the genome of Camelina sativa have been shown to potentially affect the plant's metabolism and its interactions with the environment (Kawall, 2021). Additionally, the regulatory landscape for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and genome-edited crops varies significantly across different countries, impacting the commercialization and acceptance of these technologies (Marone et al., 2023). Public perception and acceptance of genetically modified crops also play a crucial role in the adoption of these technologies. Therefore, it is essential to address these ethical and regulatory challenges through transparent communication, rigorous safety assessments, and the development of clear regulatory frameworks to ensure the responsible use of biotechnology in Camellia breeding (Marone et al., 2023; Ye et al., 2023). 9 Challenges and Limitations in Utilizing Genomic Resources 9.1 Data integration and complexity in genomic data for Camellia species Integrating and managing the vast amounts of genomic data generated for Camellia species presents significant challenges. The complexity arises from the need to incorporate extensive genomic information alongside new phenotypic data, which is crucial for understanding genotype-by-environment interactions and improving prediction models for complex traits (Eeuwijk et al., 2019). The development of new genotype-to-phenotype (G2P) models that can handle this integration is essential but remains a significant hurdle (Eeuwijk et al., 2019). Additionally, the uneven distribution of repetitive sequences and genomic rearrangements, as observed in species like Camellia lanceoleosa, further complicates data integration efforts (Gong et al., 2022). 9.2 Limited genomic resources for non-model Camellia species While significant progress has been made in sequencing and understanding the genomes of some Camellia species, many non-model species still lack comprehensive genomic resources. This limitation hampers the ability to conduct detailed genetic and genomic studies necessary for effective breeding programs. For instance, the genomic resources available for Camellia oleifera are still in the early stages, and more extensive sequencing and characterization are needed to fully exploit its breeding potential (Yan et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). The lack of genomic data for these non-model species restricts the application of advanced breeding techniques such as genomic selection and marker-assisted selection (Thudi et al., 2020; Merrick et al., 2022).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzMg==