MPB_2024v15n5

Molecular Plant Breeding 2024, Vol.15, No.5, 308-316 http://genbreedpublisher.com/index.php/mpb 313 head-rice yield in elite Western U.S. rice germplasm, demonstrating its potential for improving milling quality in commercial rice varieties (Nelson et al., 2012). The identification of QTLs such as qGL5 and qPGWC-5 has facilitated marker-assisted selection (MAS) in rice breeding. By incorporating these QTLs into breeding programs, researchers have been able to develop rice varieties with superior grain quality traits, meeting both domestic and international market demands (Nelson et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2016). These studies highlight the importance of understanding the genetic basis of grain quality traits and the application of QTL mapping in the development of high-quality rice varieties. 5 Integration of QTL Mapping and Breeding 5.1 Combining QTL mapping with traditional breeding strategies Combining QTL mapping with traditional breeding strategies has proven to be a powerful approach to enhance rice yield and quality. Traditional breeding methods, which rely on phenotypic selection, can be significantly improved by incorporating QTL mapping to identify genomic regions associated with desirable traits. This integration allows breeders to make more informed decisions and accelerate the development of high-yielding, stress-resistant rice varieties. For instance, QTL-seq, a method involving whole-genome resequencing of DNA from bulked populations, has been successfully applied to identify QTLs for important agronomic traits such as partial resistance to rice blast disease and seedling vigor (Takagi et al., 2013). Additionally, the use of advanced backcross QTL analysis and introgression lines has facilitated the exploitation of major QTLs from less adapted germplasms, such as landraces and wild relatives, to improve grain yield under abiotic stress conditions (Guo and Ye, 2014). 5.2 Use of marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) Marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) are two advanced breeding techniques that leverage QTL mapping data to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of breeding programs. MAS involves the use of DNA markers linked to target traits to select individuals carrying desirable alleles, thereby accelerating the breeding process (Huang and Hong, 2024). This method has been effectively used to integrate major genes or QTLs with large effects into widely grown rice varieties, improving traits such as disease resistance and stress tolerance (Jena and Mackill, 2008). On the other hand, GS uses genome-wide markers to predict the breeding value of individuals, allowing for the selection of superior genotypes based on their genetic potential rather than phenotypic performance alone. GS has shown promise in improving breeding efficiency for complex traits like grain yield, plant height, and flowering time, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.31 to 0.63 depending on the trait and statistical model used (Spindel et al., 2015). 5.3 Challenges and solutions in integrating QTL data into breeding programs Integrating QTL data into breeding programs presents several challenges, including the complexity of quantitative traits, the need for high-resolution mapping, and the variability of QTL effects across different genetic backgrounds and environments. One major challenge is the accurate identification and validation of QTLs with significant effects on target traits. Advances in next-generation sequencing and meta-analysis techniques have helped address this issue by increasing mapping resolution and narrowing down QTL regions, making them more suitable for MAS and fine mapping (Swamy and Sarla, 2011). Another challenge is the effective utilization of QTL data in breeding programs, which requires careful consideration of the genetic architecture of traits and the development of efficient selection schemes. Practical guidelines derived from theoretical and empirical studies can guide the design of efficient marker-assisted gene introgression and pyramiding schemes, ensuring the successful application of QTL data in breeding programs (Francia et al., 2005; Guo and Ye, 2014). 6 Challenges and Future Directions 6.1 Current limitations in QTL mapping and application Despite significant advancements in QTL mapping for rice yield and quality, several limitations persist. One major challenge is the complexity of quantitative traits, which are often controlled by multiple genes with small effects, making it difficult to identify and manipulate individual QTLs effectively (Takagi et al., 2013).

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzMg==