International Journal of Aquaculture, 2013, Vol.3, No.6, 23
          
        
        
          -
        
        
          
            29
          
        
        
        
          25
        
        
          respectively (Figure 4). There was significant differences
        
        
          (
        
        
          ANOVA, p<0.05) in growth rate among ponds, with
        
        
          fish sampled from maize bran fed ponds having the
        
        
          highest growth rate, followed by fish fed with chicken
        
        
          manure pond and, the control pond had the least growth:
        
        
          Specific Growth Rate: was significantly different (ANOVA,
        
        
          p<0.05) among the three experimental ponds. The
        
        
          specific growth rate of fish sampled from maize bran and
        
        
          chicken manure fed ponds decreased significantly from
        
        
          week 8 to week 24. However, the fish from maize bran
        
        
          and chicken manure fed ponds showed considerably
        
        
          higher specific growth rate than the control pond (Figure 5).
        
        
          Condition factor: results for each pond are shown in
        
        
          Figure 6. High condition factor value ranges were observed
        
        
          in maize bran fed fish which had a mean condition factor
        
        
          of (9.46±0.91) K, chicken manure (7.17±0.16) K and for
        
        
          fish in the control pond it was with (3.88±0.16) K.
        
        
          Condition factor difference were statistically significant
        
        
          (
        
        
          ANOVA, p<0.05) in fish sampled from all the ponds.
        
        
          Figure 4 Percentage weight gain for the three experimental ponds
        
        
          Figure 5 Specific growth rates for maize bran, chicken manure and
        
        
          the control pond
        
        
          Figure 6 Condition factor for the maize bran, chicken manure
        
        
          and control fed fish
        
        
          
            1.3
          
        
        
          
            Survival rate
          
        
        
          Survival was variable among ponds, but was not
        
        
          significantly (ANOVA, p>0.05) different among pond
        
        
          treatments and the fish in control pond had the
        
        
          highest survival rate (90%) as shown in Table 1.
        
        
          Table 1 Survival rate for the three ponds carried out in the
        
        
          experiment
        
        
          Pond
        
        
          Number
        
        
          Survival rate (%)
        
        
          Maize bran
        
        
          22
        
        
          76.7
        
        
          ±12.3
        
        
          Chicken manure
        
        
          19
        
        
          63.3
        
        
          ±9.6
        
        
          Control
        
        
          27
        
        
          90.0
        
        
          ±4.9
        
        
          
            2
          
        
        
          
            Discussion
          
        
        
          Total dissolved substances, electrical conductivity
        
        
          and light penetration recorded during this study are
        
        
          important ecological variables in aquaculture (Ellis
        
        
          et al., 2002). Okpokwasiti and Obah (1991) reported
        
        
          highly significant seasonal variations in total dissolved
        
        
          solids, electrical conductivity and light penetration
        
        
          of ponds, the same to what was done in this study.
        
        
          Similar results were also reported by (Ahmad et al
        
        
          
            .
          
        
        
          , 2008)
        
        
          who observed that planktonic biomass and fish
        
        
          production depend highly on conductivity and total
        
        
          dissolved solutes to maintain a high specific growth rate.
        
        
          The light penetration varied significantly during this
        
        
          experiment and the variations maybe attributed to
        
        
          the different chemical constituents in the maize bran
        
        
          and the chicken manure feeds which absorb
        
        
          components of light differently when dissolved in
        
        
          water. Water transparency was consistently higher in
        
        
          the control pond which could be possibly due to low
        
        
          or no phytoplankton production in the water because
        
        
          there was no feed applied. Light penetration depends