Page 11 - ME-436-v3-3

Basic HTML Version

Genomics and Applied Biology
29
2.4 Analysis of SSR profiles
Pair similarity coefficients were calculated for all
pairwise combinations of the parental lines according
to the method developed by Nei and Li (1979):
Sij=
2Nij / (Ni+ Nj)
, where
Sij
is the similarity between
parents
i
and
j
;
Nij
is the number of bands present in
both parents;
Ni
is the number of bands present only
in parent I;
Nj
is the number of bands present only in
parent
j
. GD (genetic distance) was calculated as GD=
1-
Sij
. The similarity matrix from SSR markers, which
were computed using NTSYS-PC version 2.1 (Rohlf,
2001) were used to construct dendrograms based on
UPGMA (the unweighted pair- group method with
arithmetic means). Using the same NTSYS software, a
cophenetic value matrix was calculated to test the
goodness of fit for the cluster analysis to the original
distance matrix.
For studying the relationship between SSR molecular
maker and hybrids performance and heterosis, the mid
parent heterosis (MPH) was computed using the
formula 100 × (F
1
-MP)/MP, where F
1
is the hybrid
performance and MP is the mid-parent mean. Per cent
heterosis in F
1
over commercial check (CC) was
computed using the formula 100 × (F
1
-CC)/CC, where
CC commercial check mean.
References
Beasley J.O., 1940, The origin of American tetraploid
Gossypium
species, Am. Nat., 74: 285–286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/280895
Bernardo R., 1992, Relationship between single-cross
performance and molecular marker heterozygosity, Theor.
Appl. Genet., 83(5): 628-634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00226908
Davis D.D., 1978, Hybrid cotton: Specific problems and
potentials, Adv. Agron., 30:129-157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60705-1
Davis D.D., and Palomo A., eds., 1980, Yield stability of
Interspecific Hybrids NX-1, Proc. Belt. Cott. Prod. Res.
Conf., National Council of America, Memphis, TN
Diers B.W., P.B.E. McVetty, and T.C. Osborn, 1996,
Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based
on RFLP markers in oilseed rape (
Brassica napus
L.),
Crop Sci., 36(1): 79-83
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X00360001
0014x
Galanopoulou-Sendouca S., and D. Roupakias, 1999,
Performance of cotton F
1
hybrids and its relation to the
mean yield of advanced bulk generation, Eur. J. Agron.,
11(1): 53-62
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00018-0
Gutierrez O.A., S. Basu, S. Saha, J.N. Jenkins, D.B. Shoemaker,
C.L. Cheatham, and J.C. McCarty, 2002: Genetic distance
among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with
F
2
performance Crop Sci., 42(6): 1841-1847
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1841
Jones D.F., 1945, Heterosis resulting from degenerative
changes, Genetics, 30(6): 527-542
PMCid:PMC1209309
Loden H.D., and T.R. Richmond, 1915, Hybrid vigor in
cotton–cytogenetic aspects and pratical applications, Econ.
Bot., 5: 387-408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02984805
Meredith W.R., and J.S. Brown, 1998, Heterosis and combining
ability of cotton originating from different regions of the
United States, J. Cotton Sci., 2: 77-84
Mohammadi S.A., Prassana B.M., Sudan C., and Singh N.N.,
2008, SSR heterogenic patterns of Maize parental lines
and prediction of hybrid performance, Journal of
Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipments, 22(1):
541-547
Nei M., and W. Li, 1979, Mathematical model for studying
genetic variation terms of restriction endonucleases, Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 6: 5269-5273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
Riaz A., G. Li, Z. Quresh, M.S. Swati, and C.F. Quiros, 2001,
Genetic diversity of oilseed
Brassica napus
inbred lines
based on sequence-related amplified polymorphism and its
relation to hybrid performance, Plant Breeding, 120:
411-415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00636.x
Rolf F.J., ed., 2001, NTSYS-PC Numerical Taxonomy and
Multivariate Analysis System, Exeter Publ, Setauket
Roupakias D.G., E. Gouli-Vavdinoudi, M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, S.
Galanopoulou-Sendouca, and A.S. Mavromatis, 1998,
Heterosis in cotton, Biotechnology in agricultural and
forestry, In: Y. P. S. Bajaj (ed), Cotton, Springer- Verlag,
Berlin, pp.140-172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80373-4_9
Saghaii-Maroof M.A., Soliman K.M., Jorgensen R.A., and
Allard R.W., 1984, Ribosomal DNA spacer length
polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance,
Genomics and Applied Biology