Molecular Plant Breeding 2016, Vol.7, No.14, 1
        
        
          -
        
        
          10
        
        
        
          8
        
        
          3 Materials and Methods
        
        
          We used allotetraploid cultivated cotton species (2n = 4x = 52) (AD)
        
        
          1
        
        
          (
        
        
          G. hirsutum
        
        
          var. Zhongmiansuo 16
        
        
          ) and
        
        
          (AD)
        
        
          2
        
        
          (
        
        
          G. barbadense
        
        
          var. Xinhai 7
        
        
          ) as target chromosomes. The Probes were made from diploid cotton (2n = 2x
        
        
          = 26) genomic DNA (gDNA), including all 3 A genome species
        
        
          G. herbaceum var. hongxing
        
        
          (A
        
        
          1
        
        
          ), and
        
        
          G.
        
        
          arboreum var. shixiya 1
        
        
          (A
        
        
          2
        
        
          ), and
        
        
          G. herbaceum
        
        
          wild
        
        
          var. arfrium
        
        
          (A
        
        
          1-a
        
        
          ); and all 13 D genome species, including
        
        
          G.
        
        
          thurberi
        
        
          (D
        
        
          1
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. armourianum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          2-1
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. harknessii
        
        
          (D
        
        
          2-2
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. davidsonii
        
        
          (D
        
        
          3-d
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. klotzschianum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          3-k
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. aridum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          4
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. raimondii
        
        
          (D
        
        
          5
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. gossypiodies
        
        
          (D
        
        
          6
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. lobatum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          7
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. trilobum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          8
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. laxum
        
        
          (D
        
        
          9
        
        
          ),
        
        
          G. turneri
        
        
          (D
        
        
          10
        
        
          )
        
        
          and
        
        
          G. schwendimanii
        
        
          (D
        
        
          11
        
        
          ). All of the plant materials are being taken from National Wild Cotton Germplasm
        
        
          Nursery in Sanya city, Hainan, China.
        
        
          Total gDNA was extracted and purificated from immature leaves using the CTAB method (Song et al., 1999)
        
        
          .
        
        
          The
        
        
          purified total gDNA was cut off with 120
        
        
          ℃
        
        
          10 min, and examined with 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis for their
        
        
          fragment size, which was generally appropriate in 300-600bp, and then tagged with markers. The gDNA probes
        
        
          were labeled with DIG-High-Prime labeling system (Roche Company, Germany), according to the standard
        
        
          operating procedures. The preparation of mitotic metaphase chromosomes which derived from the root tip cells
        
        
          and the procedure of GISH referenced to the method of Wang (Wang et al., 1999).
        
        
          The hybridization signals were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Ziess Axioskop 2 plus). Images were
        
        
          captured by ISIS (in situ imaging system) software by adjusting their brightness and contrast. And also used this
        
        
          software to calculate the DA (distinguishing ability) value which was described by Markova et al (2007). And
        
        
          used Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software makes the plate.
        
        
          Acknowledgment
        
        
          This work was supported by the Exploring and Ultilization of Economic Crop Germplasm Resources(2013BAD01B03), the National
        
        
          Agriculture Research System of Cotton (CARS-18-36) and the Subproject of the Major Projects of Genetically Modified Organisms
        
        
          Breeding (2011ZX08005002-009) and also the Science and Technology Plan of the Jiangxi Province (20141BBF60011).
        
        
          Reference
        
        
          Adams K.L., Cronn, R., Percifield R., and Wendel J.F., 2003,Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and
        
        
          organ-specific reciprocal silencing, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 100(8): 4649-4654
        
        
        
        
          Mid:12665616 PMCid:PMC153610
        
        
          Beasley J.O. , 1940, The origin of American tetraploid
        
        
          Gossypium
        
        
          species, Am. Nat., 74(7): 285-286
        
        
        
          Cheng Z.K., Dong F.G., Langdon T., Ouyang S., Buell C.R., Gu M.H., Blattner F.R.,and Jiang J.M., 2002, Functional rice centromeres are marked by a satellite
        
        
          repeat and a centromere-specific retrotransposon, Plant Cell,14(8):1691-1704
        
        
        
          PMid:12172016 PMCid:PMC151459
        
        
          Cronn R.C., Zhao X.P., Paterson A.H., and Wendel J.F., 1996, Polymorphism and concerted evolution in a tandemly repeated gene family: 5S ribosomal DNA in
        
        
          diploid and allopolyploid cottons, J. Mol. Evol., 42(6): 685-705
        
        
        
        
          Mid:8662014
        
        
          Cui X.L., Liu F.,Liu Y.L.,Zhou Z.L.,Zhao Y.Y.,Wang C.Y.,Wang X.X.,Cai X.Y.,Wang Y.H.,Meng F.,Peng R.H.,and Wang K.B., 2015, Construction of
        
        
          cytogenetic map of
        
        
          Gossypium herbaceum
        
        
          chromosome 1 and its integration with genetic maps, Mol. Cytogenetic, 8:2-10
        
        
        
        
          Mid:25628758 PMCid:PMC4307992
        
        
          Da Rocha P.S.C.F., and Bertrand H., 1995, Structure and comparative analysis of the rDNA intergenic spacer of Brassica rapa:Implication for the function and
        
        
          evolution of the Cruciferae spacer, Eur. J. Biochem, 229(2): 550-557
        
        
        
        
          Mid:7744079
        
        
          Dejooded D.R., and Wendel J.F., 1992, Genetic diversity and origin of the Hawaiian Islands cotton,
        
        
          Gossypium tomentosum
        
        
          , Amer. J. Bot., 79: 1311-1319
        
        
        
          Endrizzi J.E., Turcotte E.L., and Kohel R.J., 1985, Genetics, cytogenetics, and evolution of
        
        
          Gossypium
        
        
          , Adv. Genet.,23:271-375
        
        
        
          Fryxell P.A., 1992, A revised taxonomic interpretation of
        
        
          Gossypium
        
        
          L.(Malvaceae), Rheedea,2(2): 108-165
        
        
          Gan Y., Liu F., Chen D.,Wu Q., Qin Q.,Wang C., Li S., Zhang X.,Wang Y.,and Wang K., 2013, Chromosomal Locations of 5S and 45S rDNA in
        
        
          Gossypium
        
        
          Genus and Its Phylogenetic Implications Revealed by FISH, PloS one, 8(6): e68207
        
        
        
        
          Mid:23826377 PMCid:PMC3695094