International Journal of Horticulture, 2016, Vol.6, No.3, 1-7
        
        
        
          5
        
        
          Orebiyi, et al (2002) is that, there will be a decrease in agricultural productivity in the long run when the ageing
        
        
          farmers can no longer perform. The arable crop farming is gender biased; male (78.3%) while female (21.7%), the
        
        
          enterprise is male dominated.  This is the peculiarity in the study area, where the female is disallowed from
        
        
          laborious work and obligated to attend to milder activities in the community.  This confirms the earlier
        
        
          conclusions of Obasi (2007) and Orebiyi et al
        
        
          .
        
        
          , (2002) that women are more involved in the less laborious
        
        
          activities.  Majority (95.8%) of the farmers was married with mean household size of 7 (Table 1). Having large
        
        
          household size is advantageous because it substitutes for labor cost (Obinne, 1989; Ezeh, 2006). About 25% of the
        
        
          respondents had no formal education while 34.2% completed primary school. Less than 15% of the farmers had
        
        
          tertiary education with mean years of education of 9 which is the drop out from secondary school in Nigeria. This
        
        
          shows that relatively the farmers had access to and acquired formal education to a certain extent which in turn
        
        
          reveals the level of development of the grassroots in the country. The finding indicates that most respondents were
        
        
          not learned and this means that there is low tendency of adopting and assimilating of agricultural innovations or
        
        
          technologies among arable crop farmers in the study areas. The modal farm size ranged between 2.01 and 3.00
        
        
          hectares of land. The mean farm size was 2.54 hectares of land which falls within the range of land holding of
        
        
          small scale farmers and they use low level of fertilizer. This is a confirmation that smallholder farmers are
        
        
          operating on a smallholding (Ezeh et al., 2008). The low holding of farm size was due to partitioning in the
        
        
          inheritance process and probably due to land reform. And this invariably will lead to more intensive land use
        
        
          systems. This implies farmers are forced to shorten fallow periods, increase investment on land and manage soil
        
        
          fertility through the addition of fertilizer.
        
        
          Factors influencing the use of fertilizer among the small holder farmers
        
        
          The result of the estimation of the factors influencing the use of fertilizer is presented in Table 2. The variables
        
        
          relating to total farm output (N) (X
        
        
          1
        
        
          ), level of education (X
        
        
          4
        
        
          ), farm size (X
        
        
          5
        
        
          ), number of farmland owned (X
        
        
          6
        
        
          ) and
        
        
          total cost of crop inputs (X
        
        
          13
        
        
          ) were significant at 5% level, implying that these variables are the important factors
        
        
          influencing farmers’ use of fertilizer in arable crop production in the study area. The level of education was
        
        
          significant, implying that farmers with higher education use fertilizer more than farmers with low level of
        
        
          education and that education is a major factor influencing the use of fertilizer among smallholder arable crop
        
        
          farmers. This could be attributed to the fact that higher education enables the farmer to know and want to harness
        
        
          the benefits of the use of improved inputs such as fertilizer in crop production. The farm size was significant and
        
        
          positive. This result is similar to the findings of Amanze et al. (2010).
        
        
          This can be explained in terms of scale of
        
        
          operation, it has been established from literature that a higher scale of operation results in a high production
        
        
          efficiency and mostly a positive returns to scale, so farmers with large farmlands are disposed to using all
        
        
          necessary input including fertilizer indicating that farmers with larger farm size use more fertilizer than farmers
        
        
          with small farm size, this variable has direct relationship with the variables total output in naira, number of
        
        
          farmland owned and total cost of crop input which are also significant at 5%.
        
        
          Constraints to fertilizer use in Osun State
        
        
          From the logistic regression result, age of farmer (X
        
        
          3
        
        
          ), family size (X
        
        
          11
        
        
          ), income from other farm enterprise (X
        
        
          7
        
        
          ),
        
        
          and price of fertilizer (X
        
        
          10
        
        
          ), are highly insignificant at 5% significant level and can constitute the constraints to the
        
        
          use of fertilizer. Age of farmers has positive coefficient and it is insignificant, older farmers tend not to use
        
        
          fertilizer due to their cultural and traditional knowledge of practicing agriculture and suspected health risk of
        
        
          fertilizer consumption. Most farmers perceived price of fertilizer as being a deterrent to its use.  Fertilizer prices
        
        
          keep on increasing and do not offer farmers much incentive to its use. A major characteristics of sole farming as a
        
        
          production organization is that the farmers household and the farm are not separated in terms of asset and liability
        
        
          thus, the farm family size can be a major constraint because the farmer will distribute his total income between his
        
        
          household and the farm and the higher the family size the more he spends to cater for them which may cut back on
        
        
          the total amount invested in farming. High income from other farm enterprise would make a farmer to shift
        
        
          attention from farming hence invest less and use less of fertilizer.
        
        
          Conclusion and Recommendations