基本HTML版本
International Journal of Horticulture. 2015, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1-8
http://ijh.biopublisher.ca
7
Table 7 Effect of integrated weed management practices on number of tillers plant-1 in turmeric-
kharif
, 2012
Treatment
60
DAP
120
DAP
180
DAP
240
DAP
T
1
PE metribuzin 0.7 kg·ha
-1
+ HW on 45 and 75 DAP
1.13
2.87
3.31
3.17
T
2
PE metribuzin 0.7 kg·ha
-1
+ POE fenoxaprop 67 g·ha
-1
+ metsulfuron 4 g·ha
-1
(Tank
mix) on 45 DAP
0.85
2.33
2.40
2.29
T
3
PE metribuzin 0.7 kg·ha
-1
+ straw mulch 10 t·ha
-1
on 10 DAP + HW on 75 DAP
0.93
2.40
2.49
2.38
T
4
PE pendimethalin 1.0 kg·ha
-1
+ HW on 45 and 75 DAP
1.07
2.76
3.24
3.10
T
5
PE pendimethalin 1.0 kg·ha
-1
+ POE fenoxaprop 67 g·ha
-1
+ metsulfuron 4 g·ha
-1
(Tank mix) on 45 DAP
0.81
2.30
2.36
2.26
T
6
PE pendimethalin 1.0 kg·ha
-1
+ straw mulch 10 t·ha
-1
on 10 DAP + HW on 75 DAP
0.86
2.53
2.85
2.63
T
7
PE atrazine 0.75 kg·ha
-1
+ HW on 45 and 75 DAP
0.84
2.40
2.59
2.48
T
8
PE atrazine 0.75 kg·ha
-1
+ POE fenoxaprop 67 g·ha
-1
+ metsulfuron 4 g·ha
-1
(Tank
mix) on 45 DAP
0.80
2.27
2.33
2.23
T
9
PE atrazine 0.75 kg·ha
-1
+ straw mulch 10 t·ha
-1
on 10 DAP + HW on 75 DAP
0.83
2.33
2.40
2.29
T
10
PE oxyfluorfen 0.30 kg·ha
-1
+ HW on 45 and 75 DAP
0.93
2.53
3.03
2.73
T
11
PE oxadiargyl 0.25 kg·ha
-1
+ HW on 45 and 75 DAP
0.85
2.40
2.59
2.48
T
12
POE glyphosate 1.03 kg·ha
-1
on 25 DAP + HW on 45 and 75 DAP
0.80
2.33
2.50
2.39
T
13
POE glyphosate 1.54 kg·ha
-1
on 25 DAP + HW on 45 and 75 DAP
0.85
2.34
2.23
2.13
T
14
HW on 25, 45 and 75 DAP
1.00
2.65
3.08
2.90
T
15
Unweeded check
0.76
2.00
2.13
2.04
SEd 0.06
0.13
0.15
0.17
CD (P=0.05) 0.12
0.27
0.31
0.35
sincere thanks to Dr. N. K. Prabakaran, Professor (Agronomy)
for given a valuable guidance during my Ph.D research and I
special thanks to my Ph.D members, Professor and Head
(Department of Agronomy) and Dr. K. Velayudham, Director of
Crop Management, TNAU for given a guidelines to correct
direction during my research.
References
Angles, S., A. Sundar and M. Chinnadurai, 2011, Impact of
globalization on production and export of turmeric in
India-An economic analysis, Agric. Economics Res.
Review, 24: 301-308
Anonymous, 2013, Ministry of Agriculture. Selected State-wise
area, production and productivity of turmeric, Govt. of
India.
In:
http://www.indiastat.com
.
Babu V., 2008, Physiological studies on weed control efficiency
in turmeric (
Curcuma longa
L.) M.Sc. Thesis, College of
Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad
Chander S., B.S. Panwar, S.K. Katyal, and Mahendra Singh,
1997, Growth pattern of American cotton (
Gossypium
hirsutum
) and weeds as affected by herbicides and fertility
Levels, Indian J. Weed Sci., 29 (3&4): 185-188
Channappagoudar B.B., N.R. Biradar, T.D. Bharmagoudar, and
R.V. Koti, 2007, Crop weed competition and chemical
control of weeds in potato, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20 (4):
715-718
Channappagoudar B.B., V. Babu, Y. B. Naganagoudar, and
Santosha Rathod, 2013, Influence of herbicides on
morpho-physiological growth parameters in turmeric
(
Curcuma longa
L.), The Bioscan., 8(3): 1019-1023
Dandge M.S., and R.N. Satao, 1999, Evaluation of trifluralin in
onion, Pestol., 23(10): 30-33
Hashim S., K. B. Marwat, and G. Hassan, 2003, Chemical weed
control efficiency in potato (
Solanum tuberosum
L.) under
agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar, Pakistan, Pakistan J.
Weed Sci. Res., 9(1-2): 105-110
Jackson M.L., 1973, Soil chemical analysis. Prentice hall of
India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Jan, H., A. Muhammad, and A. Ali, 2004, Studies on weed
control in potato in Pakhal plains of Mansehra, Pakistan. J.
Weed Sci. Res., 10(3-4): 157-160
Kandiannan K., and K.K. Chandaragiri, 2004, Monetary and
non-monetary inputs on turmeric growth, nutrient uptake,
yield and economics under irrigated condition, Indian J.
Hort., 65(2): 209-213