International Journal of Horticulture 2015, Vol.5, No.17, 1
-
7
7
performance. This is true with respect to cherry,
Currant, UC28B and Romavf for all characters under
study. This suggested that combining ability of parent
used in this study can be judge accurately by their
perse performance. Similar results were reported by
Dhaliwal et al. (2000) in brinjal. Bad general
combiners for all characters under study except for
percentage damaged fruits were recorded by the lines
Golden Roma and RioGrandei indicating that their
hybrids performed below average. The high positive
general combining ability (GCA) for percentage
damaged fruits indicated their high level of
susceptibility to heat. Ajjappalavara and Dharmatt
(2008), noticed that the segregation of population to
the inheritance of heat tolerance was 3 (tolerance): 1
(susceptible) ratio and suggested single gene
inheritance for heat tolerance. Hannan et al
.
(2007)
and Signh et al
.
(2001) had also observed some
tomato genotypes with good general combining ability
in number of flower clusters, plant height at 60 days
after transplanting and number of fruits per plant. This
study has identified potentials genotypes with high
level of agronomic character because of the
appreciable level of heterosis observed. Both positive
and negative heterotic values were recorded from all
the character under study. The reseasonabe
positive heterosis over higher parents recorded by
Currant x RioGrandei for plant height is an indication
of tall plant. Negative higher parents heterosis
recorded by Cherry x RioGrandei is an indication
of short plant. The cross, Curran t x GoldenRoma
also recorded positive higher parents heterotic values
for weight of fruits which indicates excellent yield.
However, it does not always follow that high mean
performance of crosses imply high heterosis of such
crosses. Sometime such performance may be as a
result of luxuriant growth; this is the same with
positive heterosis recorded by Currant x
RioGrandei for plant height. This is similar to work of
Tadese et al (2008). Though heterosis is minimal in
self pollinated plant as reported by Romeo (1990).
Hannan et al (2007) had observed positive higher
parent heterosis in some tomato crosses with respect
to number of leaves and plant height. All the crosses
recorded negative heterosis over higher parents for
percentage damaged fruits. This is desirable because it
indicates high level of heat tolerance. These crosses
therefore, had good tolerance to heat than their higher
parents. Negative heterosis over parents recorded by
crosses such as Currant x UC28B, Cherry x Romavf
and Currant x Romavf for numbers of days to final
harvest is an indication of earliness.
References
Bose P., Choudhary B., Punia R.S., Sangha H.S., 2002, Manifestation of
hybrid vigour in F1 and its correlation in F2 generation of
tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill), Indian journal of horticulture,
22: 52-59
Chaudhary B., Punia R.S., and Sangha H.S., 1965, Manifestation of hybrid
vigour in F1 and its correlation in F2 generation of tomato, Indian
journal of Agriculture, 21(2): 99-104
Dhaliwal M.S., Singh S., Cheema D.S., 2000, Estimating combining ability
effects of the genetic male sterile lines of tomato for their use in hybrid
breeding, Journal of plant breeding and genetics, 54: 199-205
Dharmatti P.R., Madalgeri B.B., Mannikeri I.M., Patil R. V., Girish Patil and
Patil G., 2006, Genetic divergence studies in summer tomatoes.
Karnataka journal Agric science
,
19(2): 407-411
El-Ahmadi A.B., and Stevens M.A., 1979b, Genetics of high temperature
fruit set in the tomato. Journal American society horticultural sci. 104:
691-696
El-Mahdy i., E-Metwally G., El-Fadly and Mazrouh A.Y., 1990, Inheritance
of yield and fruit setting quality of some tomato crosses grown under
heat stress conditions in Egypt. Journal Agri. Res. Tanta Uni.
16(3): 517-526
Falconer D.S., 1981, Introduction to quantitative genetics
2
nd
edition
longman New York
Ghosh P., and Syamal K., 1993, Combining ability studies with positional
male sterile lines in tomato. Journal Maharashtra Agriculture
University, 13: 261-262.
Hannan K., Conti S., and Briggle L.W., 2007, Research on heterosis and
components of phenotypic variance in long fruited tomato hybrids.
Rivista Agronomica
, 8:383-391
Hari L., 1997, Line x testers’ analysis in tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill).ii heterosis South indian horticulture, 24(2): 49-53
Hedrick U.P., and Booth N.O., 1968, Mendelian characters in tomatoes,
Proc. American society horticultural science, 5: 19-25
Kenga R., Alabi S.O., and Gupta S.C., 2004, Combining ability studies in
tropical sorghum (
Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench). Field crop research,
88: 251-260
Mahesh D.K., Apte Y.B., and Jadhan B.B., 2006, Studies on genetics
divergence in tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill). Crop research,
32(2): 401-403
Rao N., Rajput Y.S., and Singh A.K., 1978, Genetics divergence in tomato
using non-hierarchical clustering approach, Vegetable Science., 25(2):
133-135
Rick C. M., 1969, Origins of cultivated tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill).Current status of problem, Abstract, XI International congress,
p-180
Romeo T. P., 1990,
Genetics improvement of tomato
, AVRDC, PP. 223-257.
Singh B., Singh S.K., Naresh R.K., Singh K.V., Bantnagar S.K., and Kumar
A., 2011, General combining ability analysis of yield and its
contributing traits in tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill), Plant
Achieves volume, 11(1): 201-204
Tadesse T., Tesse T., Ejeta G., 2008, Combining ability of introduced
sorghum parental lines for major morpho-agronomic traits, Journal of
SAT Agriculture research, 6: 1-7
Veershety, 2004, Studies on the variabity of characters association and
genetic diversity in tomato (
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill), M
.sc.
Thesis. Univ. Agric. Sci
, Dharwad
Viredelwala H. A., Nandpuri K. S., and Singh S., (1987), Heterosis and
combining ability in tomato, Vegetable Science,
8: 120-129
Yadav W., Srivastava J.P., Hamveer S., Srivastava B.P., Verma H.P.S., and
Singh H., 1989, Heterosis in relation to combining ability in tomato,
Vegetable Science, 25(1): 43-47
Yordanaov., 1983, Parent selection in tomato based on the morpho-physiological
traits. Horticulture Science, 14: 458