Tree Genetics and Molecular Breeding 2012, Vol.2, No.2, 8
              
            
            
              -
            
            
              
                14
              
            
            
              
                http://tgmb.sophiapublisher.com
              
            
            
              12
            
            
              Table 3 The molecular evolution relative rate of ITS sequences in different clusters of
            
            
              
                Buxus genus
              
            
            
              Group1/Group2
            
            
              ITS
            
            
              -
            
            
              1
            
            
              ITS
            
            
              -
            
            
              2
            
            
              ITS
            
            
              -
            
            
              1
            
            
              △
            
            
              K
            
            
              P
            
            
              △
            
            
              K
            
            
              P
            
            
              △
            
            
              K
            
            
              P
            
            
              Ⅲ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅰ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0763±0.0185
            
            
              0.009**
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0094±0.0024
            
            
              0.011*
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0191±0.0033
            
            
              0.002**
            
            
              Ⅲ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅱ
            
            
              0.0202±0.0061
            
            
              0.030*
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0004±0.0026
            
            
              0.877
            
            
              0.0092±0.0019
            
            
              0.009**
            
            
              Ⅳ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅰ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.1652±0.0343
            
            
              0.005**
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0051±0.0184
            
            
              0.809
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0517±0.0033
            
            
              0.000**
            
            
              Ⅳ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅱ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0687±0.0350
            
            
              0.121
            
            
              0.0039±0.0184
            
            
              0.851
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0234±0.0018
            
            
              0.000**
            
            
              Ⅳ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅲ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0889±0.0348
            
            
              0.063
            
            
              0.0044±0.0185
            
            
              0.825
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0326±0.0007
            
            
              0.000**
            
            
              Ⅳ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅶ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.1133±0.0337
            
            
              0.006**
            
            
              0.0005±0.0185
            
            
              0.982
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0375±0.0042
            
            
              0.000**
            
            
              Ⅴ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅰ
            
            
              -
            
            
              0.0610±0.0423
            
            
              0.200
            
            
              0.1007±0.0238
            
            
              0.024*
            
            
              0.0256±0.0188
            
            
              0.223
            
            
              Ⅴ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅱ
            
            
              0.0355±0.0468
            
            
              0.483
            
            
              0.1097±0.0281
            
            
              0.011*
            
            
              0.0539±0.0220
            
            
              0.058
            
            
              Ⅴ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅲ
            
            
              0.0153±0.0467
            
            
              0.756
            
            
              0.1102±0.0281
            
            
              0.011*
            
            
              0.0447±0.0220
            
            
              0.098
            
            
              Ⅴ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅳ
            
            
              0.1042±0.0549
            
            
              0.116
            
            
              0.1058±0.0320
            
            
              0.021*
            
            
              0.0773±0.0220
            
            
              0.017*
            
            
              Ⅴ
            
            
              /
            
            
              Ⅶ
            
            
              0.0170±0.0410
            
            
              0.684
            
            
              0.1061±0.0240
            
            
              0.019*
            
            
              0.0485±0.0140
            
            
              0.003**
            
            
              Note: The ITS sequence of
            
            
              
                Pachysandra
              
            
            
              
                terminalis
              
            
            
              as reference ,
            
            
              △
            
            
              K is the margin of two groups substitution numbers relatively,
            
            
              Positive means that evolution rate of group 1 is faster than that of group 2, Negative is reverse; * means P < 0.05, ** means P < 0.01
            
            
              that pearl boxwood (Buxus sinica var.
            
            
              
                parvifolia
              
            
            
              ) was
            
            
              a kind of the
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              ’s variant. In this study we
            
            
              found that pearl boxwood (
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              var.
            
            
              
                parvifolia
              
            
            
              )
            
            
              was not a variant of
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              , but could be a kind
            
            
              of sister species, the rate of molecular evolution
            
            
              detected was different rates of evolution, the evolution
            
            
              rate of
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              was significantly higher than that
            
            
              of the pearl boxwood (
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              var.
            
            
              
                parvifolia
              
            
            
              ).
            
            
              The karyotype analysis in our laboratory also
            
            
              confirmed that two species was not the same plant
            
            
              species, the former (
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              var.
            
            
              
                parvifolia
              
            
            
              ).
            
            
              Would be more advanced evolutionary than the latter.
            
            
              In contrast,
            
            
              
                B.
              
            
            
              
                henryi
              
            
            
              would be much closer in the
            
            
              relationship than the pearl boxwood, which also had
            
            
              some supporting results in karyotype analysis. Ther-
            
            
              efore, the authors thought that pearl boxwood (
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              var.
            
            
              
                parvifolia
              
            
            
              ) was not a variant of
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              
                sinica
              
            
            
              ,
            
            
              but whether pearl boxwood could be considered as
            
            
              being independent species, which it remains to be
            
            
              validated by the barcoding genes such as
            
            
              
                matK
              
            
            
              and
            
            
              
                rbcL
              
            
            
              or other genes.
            
            
              There are many plant species in
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              genus, 17
            
            
              species existing in China only, and mainly distributed
            
            
              in the southwest of China. Therefore, Acquiring plant
            
            
              materials would be the difficulty to build the
            
            
              completely phylogenetic relationships of
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              genus,
            
            
              which we will step up the work in our lab. Authors
            
            
              believed that, the difficulty in genus
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              for
            
            
              classifying different groups might be due to the
            
            
              inter-species hybridization and continuity of the
            
            
              morphological variation. If we directly study the
            
            
              phylogenetic relationships of the genus at the DNA
            
            
              levels, it would play a great action to overcome the
            
            
              synonyms or homonym in genus as well as to promote
            
            
              the studies for domestication and breeding of
            
            
              
                Buxus
              
            
            
              plant, biodiversity research and applications in garde-
            
            
              ning and landscape.
            
            
              Molecular systematics is to study the history of biolo-
            
            
              gical evolution and reconstruction of phylogenetic
            
            
              relationships based on the information of biological
            
            
              macromolecules, of which the theoretical basis,
            
            
              known as the “molecular clock hypothesis”, is the
            
            
              evolutionary rate is relatively constant with biological
            
            
              macromolecules in the evolutionary events (Tang et
            
            
              al., 2002). However, since the hypothesis has been
            
            
              proposed, there were more contentious in the studies
            
            
              of phylogenetics in higher organisms (Muse, 2000),
            
            
              especially, whether the rate of molecular evolution in
            
            
              different cluster groups of the same organisms is
            
            
              relatively consistent. Many scholars have long suspe-
            
            
              cted that this hypothesis be reasonable, and some
            
            
              experimental evidenceshas been come out negative,
            
            
              for examples, Hartl and Clark (1997) and Vawter and
            
            
              Brown (1986) independently proposed that different
            
            
              gene should have different evolutionary rate. Zhang
            
            
              and Ryder (1993) found the same gene should be
            
            
              significantly differences in evolutionary rate in different
            
            
              biological groups. Therefore, the same gene with
            
            
              allometric phenomena of molecular evolution would
            
            
              be one of the major challenges for molecular clock