Basic HTML Version
Molecular Plant Breeding 2010, Vol.1 No.5
http://mpb.sophiapublisher.com
Page 5 of 10
Table 3 Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the agronomic traits in the 103 accessions
locations
Correlations
PH
SL
SPS
SD
GPS
HD
SL
-0.13
SPS
-0.16
0.48**
SD
0.06
-0.84**
0.03
GPS
-0.43**
0.38**
0.57**
-0.09
TKW
0.38**
-0.03
-0.28**
-0.13
-0.26**
SY
SPS
0.02
–
GPS
-0.14
–
0.50**
–
TKW
0.30**
–
-0.20*
–
-0.23*
FY
SL
-0.06
SPS
0.05
0.56**
SD
0.15
-0.83**
-0.04
GPS
-0.13
0.52**
0.64**
-0.25*
Note: *, **, correlation was significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability level, respectively; “–”indicates that the data was missed in
this position; See the footnote of Table 2 for the full names of the traits and locations
Table 4 Association (R2) of the SSR markers with the six agronomical traits
Trait
Marker
Map position (cM)
R2 (%)
HD
SY
FY
PH
wmc491
7.6
7.9
11.8
ns
SL
wmc446
9.1
4.85
–
ns
SL
wmc707
39.5
15.55
–
13.42
SL
wmc283
59.0
ns
–
9.27
SL
wmc262
60.9
15.28
–
12.92
SPS
wmc707
39.5
11.15
ns
ns
SD
wmc446
9.1
9.36
–
7.66
SD
wmc707
39.5
12.34
–
14.18
SD
wmc283
59.0
8.66
–
13.33
SD
wmc262
60.9
18.38
–
20.59
GPS
wmc491
7.6
14.68
13.17
ns
GPS
wmc48
7.8
9.97
ns
7.45
GPS
wmc757
10.3
ns
ns
10.56
GPS
wmc283
59.0
ns
8.17
ns
GPS
barc70
70.6
ns
ns
15.01
GPS
barc78
70.9
10.33
8.98
ns
TKW
gwm44
9.9
9.02
7.99
–
TKW
barc70
70.6
6.29
8.41
–
Note: Map position (cM) were based on the consensus map Ta-SSR-2004 (Somers et al. 2004); R2 indicates the percentage of the
total variation explained at the loci significant at P < 0.01 level; ns indicates no significance at P < 0.01 level; “–”indicates that the
data was missed; See the footnote of Table 2 for the full names of the traits and locations