International Journal of Molecular Evolution and Biodiversity 2024, Vol.14, No.5, 219-228 http://ecoevopublisher.com/index.php/ijmeb 222 4 Divergence Patterns in Coding Regions 4.1 Identification of divergent genes A comprehensive comparison of E. ulmoides chloroplast genome revealed significant sequence divergence patterns. Specifically, 59 out of 75 detected SNPs were located in gene regions, indicating a high level of genetic variability within these coding regions. Additionally, all 40 putative coding-region-located SNPs were identified as synonymous mutations, suggesting that these variations do not alter the amino acid sequences of the encoded proteins (Wang et al., 2018). This pattern of synonymous mutations highlights the presence of genetic diversity without immediate functional consequences on the protein level. 4.2 Functional implications of divergence The functional implications of the identified divergence in the coding regions of the E. ulmoides chloroplast genome are multifaceted. Although the synonymous mutations do not change the protein sequences, they can still influence gene expression, stability of mRNA, and the efficiency of protein translation. These subtle changes can have downstream effects on the plant's physiological processes and adaptation mechanisms. For instance, the high expression of the ω-3 fatty acid desaturase coding gene (EU0103017) is crucial for the biosynthesis of α-linolenic acid, which is a key component in plant metabolic pathways (Du et al., 2023). Such functional implications underscore the importance of understanding genetic divergence in the context of the overall metabolic and adaptive strategies (Qing et al., 2021; Zhong et al., 2022). 4.3 Evolutionary significance of coding region divergence The evolutionary significance of coding region divergence about the E. ulmoides chloroplast genome is profound. The presence of synonymous mutations suggests a mechanism of maintaining genetic diversity while preserving essential protein functions. This balance allows the plant to adapt to varying environmental conditions without compromising its core biological processes. Furthermore, the identification of polymorphic cpDNA fragments and the development of molecular markers provide valuable tools for studying the population genetics and evolutionary history of E. ulmoides (Wang et al., 2018). The evolutionary trajectory of E. ulmoides is also marked by whole-genome duplication events, which have contributed to its genetic complexity and adaptability (Du et al., 2023). These findings highlight the role of genetic divergence in shaping the evolutionary path and ecological success of E. ulmoides (Zhu et al., 2020). The divergence patterns in the coding regions of the E. ulmoides chloroplast genome reveal a complex interplay of genetic variability, functional implications, and evolutionary significance. These insights not only enhance our understanding of the genetic architecture of E. ulmoides but also provide a foundation for future research on its conservation and utilization. 5 Divergence Patterns in Non-Coding Regions 5.1 Analysis of intergenic regions Intergenic regions in the chloroplast genome of Eucommia ulmoides exhibit significant divergence patterns. A comprehensive comparison between two E. ulmoides chloroplast genomes revealed that most of the detected indels were distributed in the intergenic spacers, highlighting these regions as hotspots for structural variations (Wang et al., 2018). This pattern was consistent with findings in other plant species, where intergenic regions tend to show higher rates of indel mutations compared to coding regions (Yamane et al., 2006). The divergence in these regions is often driven by microstructural changes such as single nucleotide indels and tandem repeat indels, which are biased towards A/T-rich sequences. 5.2 Structural variations in non-coding DNA Structural variations in non-coding DNA, particularly in intergenic regions, play a crucial role in the evolution of the chloroplast genome. In E. ulmoides, the variations in genome size were attributed to DNA repeat variations, which have been predominantly found in non-coding regions (Wang et al., 2018). These structural changes include insertions, deletions, and the integration of foreign DNA sequences, which could lead to genome rearrangements (Liu et al., 2023). The presence of pseudogenes and their faster evolutionary rate than coding regions further contribute to the structural diversity in non-coding DNA. Additionally, microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are abundant in non-coding regions and exhibit taxon-specific variations, influencing genome structure and function.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==