International Journal of Molecular Evolution and Biodiversity 2024, Vol.14, No.4, 147-161 http://ecoevopublisher.com/index.php/ijmeb 148 2 Phylogenetic Relationships Among Vertebrates 2.1 Major vertebrate lineages Vertebrates are broadly classified into five major groups: fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Each group represents a significant evolutionary lineage with unique characteristics and adaptations. Fishes, the most diverse group, including jawless fishes (Agnatha), cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes), and bony fishes (Osteichthyes). Amphibians, including frogs, salamanders, and caecilians, amphibians are characterized by their dual life stages, aquatic larvae, and terrestrial adults. Reptiles, encompassing turtles, lizards, snakes, and crocodiles, are primarily terrestrial and exhibit a wide range of adaptations. Birds, descendants of theropod dinosaurs, are characterized by feathers, beaks, and high metabolic rates. Mammals, distinguished by the presence of mammary glands, hair, and three middle ear bones, include monotremes, marsupials, and placental mammals. The evolutionary relationships among these major vertebrate groups have been extensively studied. Molecular and morphological data have helped clarify the divergences and common ancestors of these lineages. For example, the transition from fish to tetrapods marks a significant evolutionary event, with amphibians representing the earliest tetrapods. Reptiles and birds share a common ancestor, with birds evolving from theropod dinosaurs. Mammals diverged from a common ancestor with reptiles, with monotremes representing the most basal lineage (Irisarri et al., 2017). 2.2 Recent advances in phylogenetic studies Recent advances in genomic technologies and bioinformatics have significantly enhanced phylogenetic studies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, such as RAD sequencing and ultraconserved element (UCE) sequence capture, have enabled the generation of large-scale genomic datasets, providing high-resolution phylogenies (Suchan et al., 2017). Bioinformatics tools and coalescent-based methods have improved the accuracy of species tree reconstruction, even in the presence of gene tree incongruence and gene flow. Several case studies highlight the impact of these advances. For instance, RAD sequencing has resolved the phylogeny of the fly genus Chiastocheta, which was previously unresolved using mitochondrial markers alone. Similarly, UCE data have been used to resolve the rapid radiation of gallopheasants, demonstrating the effectiveness of these methods in addressing difficult phylogenetic questions (Meiklejohn et al., 2016). Whole-genome sequencing has also been employed to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of closely related flycatcher species, revealing patterns of gene flow and introgression (Nater et al., 2015). 3 Speciation Mechanisms in Vertebrates 3.1 Allopatric speciation Geographic isolation can result from physical barriers such as mountains, rivers, or oceans, which prevent gene flow between populations. Over time, these isolated populations undergo genetic changes due to mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift, eventually leading to speciation. This mechanism is well-documented in various vertebrate groups, particularly in island and continental populations. Island populations: The Lesser Antillean anoles provide a classic example of allopatric speciation. Geological and molecular phylogenetic evidence shows that Martinique anoles, which were isolated on precursor islands, exhibit significant genetic divergence. However, secondary contact after island coalescence revealed less reproductive isolation than expected, suggesting incomplete allopatric speciation (Thorpe et al., 2010). Continental populations: In freshwater zooplankton of the genus Daphnia, allopatric speciation accounts for a significant portion of cladogenetic events. Intercontinental splits, particularly in the circumarctic region, align with bird migration routes, indicating recent dispersal and vicariance scenarios linked to continental fragmentation (Adamowicz et al., 2009).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==