International Journal of Molecular Evolution and Biodiversity 2024, Vol.14, No.4, 186-196 http://ecoevopublisher.com/index.php/ijmeb 187 2 Morphological Data in Algal Taxonomy 2.1 Traditional morphological methods Traditional morphological methods have long been the cornerstone of algal taxonomy. These methods primarily involve the examination of physical characteristics such as cell shape, size, structure, and reproductive features. Historically, taxonomists have relied on these visible traits to classify and differentiate algal species. The use of light microscopy has been fundamental in these studies, allowing researchers to observe and document the intricate details of algal morphology. However, the reliance on morphological characteristics alone has often led to challenges, particularly due to the high degree of morphological plasticity and convergence observed in many algal species (Darienko et al., 2015; Leliaert, 2021). 2.2 Microscopic techniques Advancements in microscopic techniques have significantly enhanced the resolution and accuracy of morphological studies in algal taxonomy. Improved light microscopy, coupled with electron microscopy, has allowed for more detailed observations of cellular and subcellular structures. These techniques have enabled taxonomists to identify subtle morphological differences that were previously undetectable, thus refining species boundaries. For instance, the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been instrumental in examining the surface structures of algal cells, providing critical insights into species differentiation. Additionally, digital imaging and analysis have facilitated the documentation and comparison of morphological traits, further aiding in the accurate classification of algae (Leliaert, 2021). 2.3 Limitations of morphological approaches Despite the advancements in microscopic techniques, morphological approaches in algal taxonomy are not without limitations. One of the primary challenges is the phenotypic plasticity exhibited by many algal species, where environmental factors can induce significant morphological variations within the same species. This plasticity can lead to misidentifications and taxonomic ambiguities. Moreover, morphological convergence, where unrelated species evolve similar physical traits, complicates the accurate delimitation of species based solely on morphology. These limitations underscore the need for integrative approaches that combine morphological data with molecular and ecological information to achieve more robust and reliable species delimitation (Darienko et al., 2015; Papakostas et al., 2016; Leliaert, 2021). 3 Molecular Data in Algal Taxonomy 3.1 DNA barcoding Molecular data have revolutionized the field of algal taxonomy, providing more precise and reliable methods for species delimitation compared to traditional morphological approaches. The integration of molecular techniques has allowed for the identification of cryptic species and has reshaped our understanding of algal diversity and distribution (Leliaert, 2021). DNA barcoding involves the use of short, standardized gene regions to identify species. This method has been particularly useful in algae, where morphological plasticity and convergence often complicate species identification. Commonly used barcode markers in algae include the V4 and V9 regions of the nuclear ribosomal operon and the ITS-2 region (Darienko et al., 2015). These markers have been effective in distinguishing species within genera such as Coccomyxa, revealing multiple phylogenetic lineages that correspond to distinct species (Darienko et al., 2015). However, the choice of barcode markers is crucial, as some markers may provide better resolution than others. For instance, COI and 28S markers have shown higher resolution in species delimitation compared to ITS2 in other taxa (Nolasco et al., 2022). 3.2 Phylogenetic analysis Phylogenetic analysis uses DNA sequence data to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among species. This approach has been instrumental in redefining species boundaries in algae, often revealing cryptic diversity that is not apparent from morphological data alone (Leliaert, 2021). Multi-locus phylogenetic methods, which combine data from multiple unlinked loci, have proven particularly effective in accounting for confounding factors such as incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization (Leliaert et al., 2014). For example, studies on the genus Aphonopelma have demonstrated the utility of combining mitochondrial and nuclear markers to achieve
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==