Maize Genomics and Genetics 2025, Vol.16, No.5, 239-250 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/mgg 246 Figure 2 Number of significantly associated QTNs detected by each of the seven GWAS models implemented in this study. A Number of QTNs/SNP detected for grain yield (GY); days to 50% anthesis (AD); days to 50% silking (SD); Anthesis-Silking interval (ASI); plant height (PH), eight height (EH), ear-plant height ratio (EPH) and ear per plant (EPP) under drought condition (B). Number of QTNs/SNP detected for grain yield (GY); days to 50% anthesis (AD); days to 50% silking (SD); Anthesis-Silking interval (ASI); plant height (PH), eight height (EH), ear-plant height ratio (EPH) and ear per plant (EPP) under optimum condition C. Number of QTNs detected by the eight GWAS models under drought condition (D) Number of QTNs detected by the eight GWAS models under Optimum condition (E) Chromosomal Distribution of QTN effects. The circle diameter is proportional to the absolute value of the QTN effect. The colors indicate the direction of the effects: red indicates negative QTN effect, and blue indicates positive QTN effect. F Chromosomal distribution of QTNs based on seven GWAS methods. The x-axis indicates genomic locations by chromosomal order, and the significant QTNs are plotted against genome location. Each row represents one QTN identified by a different method (Adopted from Amadu et al., 2025)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==