Legume Genomics and Genetics 2024, Vol.15, No.4, 199-209 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/lgg 204 example, the knockout of the GmTAP1 gene in soybean resulted in enhanced resistance to Phytophthora sojae without affecting plant height, pod number, or yield (Liu et al., 2023). These findings suggest that CRISPR/Cas9-edited chickpea lines should be subjected to rigorous field trials to assess their disease resistance, growth, and yield performance under various environmental conditions. 4.4 Potential impacts on chickpea cultivation The successful implementation of CRISPR/Cas9-driven genome editing in chickpeas has the potential to revolutionize chickpea cultivation. By enhancing disease resistance and stress tolerance, CRISPR/Cas9-edited chickpea lines can contribute to increased yield stability and reduced reliance on chemical pesticides. This, in turn, can lead to more sustainable and resilient agricultural practices. Moreover, the precise and predictable nature of CRISPR/Cas9 technology allows for the rapid development of improved chickpea varieties, addressing the urgent need for nutritious and high-yielding crops in the face of global food security challenges (Abdelrahman et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019). In summary, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in chickpeas holds significant promise for improving disease resistance and overall crop performance. Continued research and field trials will be crucial to fully realize the potential of this technology in chickpea breeding and cultivation (Belhaj et al., 2015). 5 Challenges and Ethical Considerations 5.1 Off-target effects and genome integrity One of the primary challenges in using the CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in legumes is the occurrence of off-target effects, which can lead to unintended mutations. Various strategies have been developed to minimize these off-target effects. For instance, the use of truncated guide RNAs (gRNAs) has been shown to significantly reduce off-target mutagenesis without compromising on-target efficiency (Fu et al., 2014). Another effective approach involves the use of ligand-dependent ribozymes called aptazymes, which have been successful in reducing off-target mutations in human cells and hold promise for plant applications as well (Hajiahmadi et al., 2019). Additionally, the double-nicking strategy using Cas9 nickase mutants with paired guide RNAs has been demonstrated to minimize off-target cleavage (Ran et al., 2013). Tools like CRISPOR.org also assist researchers in selecting gRNAs with high specificity and low off-target potential, further aiding in the reduction of unintended mutations (Concordet and Haeussler, 2018). The long-term impact of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations on genome stability is another area of concern. While the system is highly efficient in inducing targeted gene edits, the potential for off-target effects raises questions about the stability of the genome over multiple generations. Studies have shown that while CRISPR/Cas9 can produce stable and heritable mutations, the frequency and impact of off-target effects need to be carefully monitored to ensure long-term genome integrity (Figure 3) (Zhang et al., 2014). Continuous advancements in detection methods and the development of high-fidelity CRISPR/Cas9 variants are crucial for mitigating these risks (Zhang et al., 2015). 5.2 Regulatory and ethical issues The regulatory landscape for genome-edited crops varies significantly across different regions, posing a challenge for the global adoption of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in legume breeding. In the European Union, genome-edited crops are subject to stringent regulations similar to those for genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which can hinder their development and commercialization (Bhowmik et al., 2021). In contrast, the United States has a more favorable regulatory framework that facilitates the use of genome editing for crop improvement. This disparity in regulations can impact international trade and the global food supply chain, making it essential to harmonize regulatory standards to fully realize the benefits of CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Manghwar et al., 2020). The application of CRISPR/Cas9 in legumes also raises several ethical considerations. One major concern is the potential for unintended ecological consequences, such as the spread of edited genes to wild relatives or non-target species. This could disrupt local ecosystems and biodiversity. Additionally, there are ethical questions
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==