Legume Genomics and Genetics 2024, Vol.15, No.3, 126-139 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/lgg 135 6 Challenges and Limitations of Genomic Tools 6.1 Technical challenges The implementation of genomic tools in soybean breeding faces several technical challenges. One significant issue is the complexity of the soybean genome, which includes numerous genes and regulatory elements that interact in intricate networks. The high genetic variability within soybean populations further complicates the accurate prediction of phenotypic traits from genotypic data. For example, the development of the SoyDNGP model highlighted the challenges associated with accurately predicting complex traits due to the high parameter volume and complexity of the genetic structure. Another technical challenge is the need for high-quality and high-density marker data. The efficiency of genomic selection and marker-assisted selection depends on the availability of comprehensive SNP datasets and high-throughput genotyping platforms. However, generating such datasets can be resource-intensive and technically demanding. Additionally, integrating different types of omics data, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, poses significant computational challenges. The analysis and interpretation of this vast amount of data require advanced bioinformatics tools and expertise (Li et al., 2016). 6.2 Economic and resource constraints The economic and resource constraints associated with the use of genomic tools in soybean breeding are significant barriers to their widespread adoption. The initial costs of setting up high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping facilities are substantial, and ongoing expenses for reagents, equipment maintenance, and skilled personnel can be prohibitive for many breeding programs. Furthermore, the cost of whole-genome sequencing and genotyping by sequencing, although decreasing, remains high, especially when large populations need to be analyzed (Bhat and Yu, 2021). Another economic challenge is the need for substantial investment in computational infrastructure and bioinformatics expertise to handle and analyze large genomic datasets. Many breeding programs, particularly in developing countries, lack access to the necessary computational resources and trained personnel. This disparity can lead to uneven progress in the adoption and implementation of genomic tools across different regions and breeding programs (Belzile et al., 2022). 6.3 Regulatory and ethical considerations The use of genomic tools, especially gene editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9, raises several regulatory and ethical considerations. The regulatory landscape for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) varies widely across different countries, with some having stringent regulations that can hinder the development and commercialization of genetically edited soybean varieties. Navigating these regulatory frameworks can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant legal and administrative expertise (Nagamine and Ezura, 2022). Ethical concerns also arise regarding the potential environmental impacts of releasing genetically edited crops and the broader implications for biodiversity. The possibility of unintended off-target effects and gene flow to wild relatives are major concerns that need to be addressed through rigorous risk assessment and management strategies. Additionally, there is ongoing debate about the societal acceptance of GMOs and gene-edited crops, which can influence regulatory policies and market acceptance. 6.4 Integration with traditional breeding programs Integrating genomic tools with traditional breeding programs presents both logistical and methodological challenges. One of the main issues is the need to align the objectives and timelines of genomic and traditional breeding approaches. Traditional breeding cycles are often lengthy, and incorporating genomic tools requires careful planning and coordination to ensure that genomic data can be effectively used to inform selection decisions at appropriate stages of the breeding cycle. Another challenge is the need for capacity building and training of breeders in the use of genomic tools. Many breeders are accustomed to conventional phenotypic selection methods and may lack the expertise required to
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==