Field Crop 2024, Vol.7 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc © 2024 CropSci Publisher, registered at the publishing platform that is operated by Sophia Publishing Group, founded in British Columbia of Canada. All Rights Reserved.
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc © 2024 CropSci Publisher, registered at the publishing platform that is operated by Sophia Publishing Group, founded in British Columbia of Canada. All Rights Reserved. Publisher CropSci Publisher Editedby Editorial Team of Field Crop Email: edit@fc.cropscipublisher.com Website: http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc Address: 11388 Stevenston Hwy, PO Box 96016, Richmond, V7A 5J5, British Columbia Canada FieldCrop is an International Journal, is an open access, peer reviewed journal published online by CropSci Publisher. This journal publishes research articles of field crops, as well as innovative research conducted in the field, farm or on the land related to edible agricultural food crops. The research must be based on cropping system, crop physiology, crop genetics and breeding. Topics include (but are not limited to) different aspects like crop management, agronomy, plant pathology, entomology, soil science, vegetable and horticultural science related phenomena. All the articles published in Field Crop are Open Access, and are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. CropSci Publisher uses CrossCheck service to identify academic plagiarism through the world’s leading plagiarism prevention tool, iParadigms, and to protect the original authors’ copyrights. CropSci Publisher is an international Open Access publisher specializing in crop science, and crops-related research registered at the publishing platform that is operated by Sophia Publishing Group (SPG), founded in British Columbia of Canada.
Field Crop (online), 2024, Vol.7, No.5 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc © 2024 CropSci Publisher, registered at the publishing platform that is operated by Sophia Publishing Group, founded in British Columbia of Canada. All Rights Reserved. Latest Content Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Paddies: Strategies for Reduction and Climate Change Mitigation Weijie Sun, Qiangsheng Qian Field Crop, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 5, 243-251 Comparative Genomics of Lupinus Species: Implications for Crop Improvement Dandan Huang Field Crop, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 5, 252-260 Environmental Assessments of Triticale Cultivation: Implications for Crop Rotation and Soil Health Renxiang Cai Field Crop, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 5, 261-269 Resistance Management in Cotton: Addressing Bt Cotton Efficacy Shanjun Zhu, Mengting Luo Field Crop, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 5, 270-277 Agronomic Biofortification: Addressing Micronutrient Deficiencies Through Maize Cultivation Jin Zhou, Minli Xu Field Crop, 2024, Vol. 7, No. 5, 278-286
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 243 Systematic Review Open Access Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Paddies: Strategies for Reduction and Climate Change Mitigation Weijie Sun, Qiangsheng Qian Modern Agricultural Research Center, Cuixi Academy of Biotechnology, Zhuji, 311800, Zhejiang, China Corresponding email: qiangsheng.qian@cuixi.org Field Crop, 2024, Vol.7, No.5 doi: 10.5376/fc.2024.07.0024 Received: 01 Jul., 2024 Accepted: 12 Aug., 2024 Published: 01 Sep., 2024 Copyright © 2024 Sun and Qian, This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Preferred citation for this article: Sun W.J., and Qian Q.S., 2024, Greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies: strategies for reduction and climate change mitigation, Field Crop, 7(5): 243-251 (doi: 10.5376/fc.2024.07.0024) Abstract Rice cultivation is a staple of global agriculture, supporting the livelihoods of millions, but it is also a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane and nitrous oxide. These emissions contribute to climate change, necessitating the development of effective mitigation strategies. This study explores the mechanisms of GHG emissions from rice paddies, including methane production pathways and the factors influencing nitrous oxide emissions. Various strategies for reducing emissions are analyzed, such as water management techniques like alternate wetting and drying (AWD), soil fertility management through integrated nutrient approaches, and crop management practices that enhance sustainability. Furthermore, the role of rice paddies in carbon sequestration is examined, alongside policy frameworks and incentive programs to support emission reduction. A case study highlights successful implementations of these strategies and the associated outcomes. The study concludes with a discussion on the challenges to widespread adoption and the need for future research to enhance both mitigation and climate resilience in rice production systems. Keywords Rice cultivation; Greenhouse gas emissions; Methane reduction; Water management; Climate change mitigation 1 Introduction Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for nearly half of the world's population, playing a crucial role in global food security and nutrition (Jiang et al., 2019). It is predominantly cultivated in lowland irrigated systems, which are essential for maintaining high yields necessary to meet the growing demand for this vital crop (Thanuja and Karthikeyan, 2020). The significance of rice extends beyond its nutritional value, as it also supports the livelihoods of millions of farmers worldwide, particularly in Asia, where the majority of rice is produced and consumed. Despite its importance, rice cultivation is a major source of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) (Zhao et al., 2019). Rice paddies contribute significantly to global CH4 emissions due to the anaerobic conditions prevalent in flooded fields, which promote methanogenesis (Gupta et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of nitrogen fertilizers and organic amendments can increase N2O emissions, further exacerbating the global warming potential (GWP) of rice systems (Shang et al., 2021). The combined emissions of CH4 andN2O from rice paddies are a critical concern for climate change mitigation efforts (Linquist et al., 2012). Mitigating GHG emissions from rice paddies is essential for reducing the agricultural sector's impact on climate change while ensuring food security (Kumar et al., 2019). Various management practices, such as alternate wetting and drying, intermittent irrigation, and the use of plant growth regulators, have been explored to reduce CH4 and N2O emissions without compromising rice yields (Cho et al., 2021). These strategies are crucial for achieving sustainable rice production systems that balance the trade-offs between high yields and low GHG emissions (Hussain et al., 2015). Understanding the interactions between different management practices and site-specific conditions is vital for developing effective mitigation approaches (Jiang et al., 2018). This study integrates existing strategies for greenhouse gas emission reduction in rice paddies and their effectiveness in mitigating climate change, evaluates the impacts of various management measures on CH4 and
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 244 N2O emissions, assesses their potential to balance yield and emissions reduction, and identifies knowledge gaps and future research needs, aiming to provide decision-makers and stakeholders with information on best practices for sustainable rice cultivation in the context of climate change. 2 Mechanisms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Paddies 2.1 Methane emissions: sources and pathways Methane CH4 emissions from rice paddies primarily result from microbial methanogenesis, which occurs under anaerobic conditions in waterlogged soils. Methanogenesis is the final step in the anaerobic degradation of organic matter, where methanogens utilize substrates such as acetate (aceticlastic methanogenesis) or hydrogen plus carbon dioxide (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis) (Conrad, 2020). Additionally, methane can be oxidized anaerobically in the presence of alternative electron acceptors like nitrate, ferric iron, or sulfate, which can mitigate CH4 emissions (Fan et al., 2020). The presence of rice plants also influences methane emissions by providing pathways for methane transport through aerenchyma and by supplying substrates for methanogenesis, although they can also suppress emissions by delivering oxygen to the rhizosphere, which enhances methane oxidation (Oda and Chiếm, 2019). 2.2 Nitrous oxide emissions: mechanisms of production Nitrous oxide N2O emissions from rice paddies are primarily produced through microbial processes such as nitrification and denitrification. Nitrification occurs under aerobic conditions where ammonia is oxidized to nitrate, while denitrification happens under anaerobic conditions where nitrate is reduced to N2O and nitrogen gas. The intermittent wetting and drying cycles in rice paddies create fluctuating aerobic and anaerobic conditions that favor these processes (Gupta et al., 2021). The application of nitrogen fertilizers can significantly influence N2O emissions by providing substrates for nitrification and denitrification (Liu et al., 2016). 2.3 Factors influencing emission levels Several factors influence the levels of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies, including water management, soil type, and agricultural practices. Water management practices, such as intermittent flooding, can reduce methane emissions by promoting aerobic conditions that inhibit methanogenesis and enhance methane oxidation (Malyan et al., 2016). Soil type also plays a crucial role, as soils with higher organic matter content tend to produce more methane due to the availability of substrates for methanogens (Sun et al., 2018). Additionally, the use of fertilizers and amendments can impact emissions; for instance, nitrate-based fertilizers can enhance anaerobic methane oxidation, thereby reducing methane emissions. The presence of specific microbial communities, such as sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane-oxidizing bacteria, can also mitigate methane production through competitive and mutualistic interactions. Furthermore, the conversion of rice paddies to other land uses, such as aquaculture, has been shown to reduce both methane and nitrous oxide emissions significantly. 3 Strategies for Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.1 Water management techniques Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is a water management technique that involves the periodic drying and re-flooding of rice paddies (Figure 1). This method has been shown to significantly reduce methane (CH₄) emissions, which are a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields. Studies have demonstrated that AWD can reduce CH₄ emissions by up to 95% compared to continuous flooding (CF) systems, while also conserving water by 25%~70% (Runkle et al., 2018). Additionally, AWD has been found to maintain or even improve rice yields under certain conditions, making it a viable alternative to traditional irrigation methods (Sriphirom et al., 2019; Malumpong et al., 2020). Synchronous irrigation involves coordinating the irrigation schedules of multiple fields to optimize water use and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This technique can be particularly effective when combined with AWD, as it allows for more efficient water distribution and reduces the overall water footprint of rice cultivation. Studies have shown that synchronous irrigation can further enhance the benefits of AWD by improving water productivity and reducing the global warming potential (GWP) of rice paddies.
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 245 Figure 1 Wetting and drying regimes during the AWD irrigation (Adopted from Haque et al., 2021) 3.2 Soil fertility management Integrated nutrient management (INM) involves the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers to optimize soil fertility and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This approach can enhance the efficiency of nutrient use, thereby reducing the need for chemical fertilizers, which are a significant source of nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. Studies have shown that INM can reduce N₂O emissions by up to 66% when combined with water-saving irrigation techniques like AWD (Islam et al., 2020). The use of organic amendments, such as biochar and compost, can improve soil health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies (Liang, 2024). Biochar, in particular, has been shown to reduce CH₄ emissions by up to 40.6% when applied to rice fields. Additionally, organic amendments can enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, which can further mitigate climate change by sequestering carbon in the soil (Sriphirom et al., 2020). 3.3 Crop management practices Selecting rice varieties that are more efficient in water and nutrient use can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Varieties that have shorter growing periods or are more resistant to drought and pests can reduce the need for water and chemical inputs, thereby lowering CH₄ and N₂O emissions. Research has shown that certain rice varieties can maintain high yields under AWD conditions, making them suitable for sustainable rice production (Ishfaq et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Crop rotation and diversification involve alternating rice cultivation with other crops to improve soil health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Sun and Qian, 2024). This practice can break pest and disease cycles, reduce the need for chemical inputs, and enhance soil fertility. Studies have indicated that crop rotation can reduce CH₄ emissions by altering the microbial activity in the soil, which is responsible for methane production. Additionally, diversifying crops can improve the resilience of farming systems to climate change, further contributing to greenhouse gas mitigation. 4 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies 4.1 Role of rice paddies in carbon sequestration Rice paddies play a significant role in carbon sequestration, which is crucial for mitigating climate change. The incorporation of organic fertilizers and the adoption of no-till practices have been shown to enhance soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. For instance, replacing synthetic nitrogen with organic fertilizers in rice paddies can significantly decrease net greenhouse gas emissions and improve rice yield, thereby contributing to carbon sequestration (Shang et al., 2021). Additionally, no-till practices, especially when combined with residue retention, have been found to reduce methane emissions and enhance SOC sequestration, although the increase in nitrous oxide emissions needs to be managed carefully (Zhao et al., 2016). Integrated management practices, such as reduced water usage, tillage with residue management, and reduced mineral nitrogen fertilizer, have also demonstrated potential in increasing SOC stocks in rice paddies (Begum et al., 2018).
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 246 Figure 2 Management practices of C sequestration (Adopted from Dheri and Nazir, 2021) 4.2 Policy and incentive frameworks for emission reduction Effective policy and incentive frameworks are essential for encouraging farmers to adopt practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies. Policies that promote the use of water-saving irrigation techniques, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and intermittent irrigation, can significantly reduce methane emissions while maintaining rice yields (Islam et al., 2020. Additionally, providing incentives for the adoption of improved rice varieties that are more efficient in nitrogen uptake and less dependent on continuous flooding can further reduce emissions (Zhao et al., 2019). Policymakers should also consider supporting the use of biochar amendments, which have been shown to decrease methane and nitrous oxide emissions while increasing crop yields (Wu et al., 2019). These frameworks should be designed to balance the trade-offs between reducing emissions and ensuring food security. 4.3 Education and awareness programs for farmers Education and awareness programs are critical for equipping farmers with the knowledge and skills needed to implement greenhouse gas mitigation strategies effectively. Training programs that focus on the benefits and techniques of water-saving irrigation practices, such as intermittent irrigation and AWD, can help farmers reduce methane emissions from their rice paddies (Jiang et al., 2019; Lansing et al., 2023). Additionally, educating farmers about the advantages of using organic fertilizers and biochar amendments can promote practices that enhance soil carbon sequestration and reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions. Awareness campaigns should also highlight the importance of adopting improved rice varieties and no-till practices to achieve sustainable rice production with lower emissions (Xu et al., 2015). By providing farmers with the necessary information and resources, these programs can facilitate the widespread adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices. 5 Case Study 5.1 Successful implementation of emission reduction strategies Several studies have demonstrated the successful implementation of various strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies. For instance, a global meta-analysis highlighted that non-flooding irrigation methods, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD), significantly reduced methane (CH₄) emissions by 53% compared to continuous flooding, although it did increase nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions by 105% (Jiang et al., 2019). Another study in China showed that water-saving irrigation strategies, such as flooded and wet intermittent irrigation (FWI) and flooded and dry intermittent irrigation (FDI), reduced CH₄ emissions by 60% and 83%, respectively, compared to continuous flooding (Xu et al., 2015). Additionally, early-season drainage combined with mid-season drainage was found to reduce CH₄ emissions and yield-scaled global warming potential (GWP) by 85-90% compared to continuous flooding. 5.2 Analysis of outcomes The outcomes of these strategies have been multifaceted, impacting both GHG emissions and rice yields. For example, the implementation of AWD not only reduced CH₄ emissions by 38% but also increased water use efficiency by 40%, although it led to a 34% increase in N₂O emissions (Wang et al., 2020). Similarly, the use of FWI and FDI irrigation strategies resulted in a reduction of GWP and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) by up to 29%, while maintaining rice yields when using drought-resistant rice varieties. In another case, replacing synthetic
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 247 nitrogen with organic fertilizer in paddy rice significantly decreased net GHG emissions and improved rice yield (Shang et al., 2021). These findings suggest that while some strategies may lead to trade-offs between different types of GHG emissions, they can still achieve overall reductions in GWP and maintain or even enhance rice yields. 5.3 Lessons learned and best practices From these case studies, several lessons and best practices have emerged. First, water management practices such as AWD and early-season drainage are effective in reducing CH₄ emissions and overall GWP, although they may increase N₂O emissions (Islam et al., 2018). Therefore, it is crucial to balance the trade-offs between different GHGs. Second, integrating organic fertilizers and optimizing nitrogen application rates can further mitigate GHG emissions while enhancing rice yields. Third, the selection of drought-resistant rice varieties can help maintain yields under water-saving irrigation regimes, making these strategies more viable for farmers. Lastly, continuous adaptation and localized management, as demonstrated by Balinese farmers, can lead to both reduced GHG emissions and increased rice yields, highlighting the importance of community-based approaches (Lansing et al., 2023). 6 Policy and Economic Considerations 6.1 Role of government and international agencies Governments and international agencies play a crucial role in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies. Effective policies and regulations are essential to promote sustainable agricultural practices and reduce emissions. For instance, regulatory bodies can formulate policies that encourage the adoption of water management practices such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and intermittent irrigation, which have been shown to significantly reduce methane (CH₄) emissions from rice fields (Lansing et al., 2023). Additionally, international agencies can facilitate the exchange of knowledge and technology, helping to implement best practices globally. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides scaling factors for different water management practices, which can guide policymakers in setting realistic and effective emission reduction targets (Jiang et al., 2019). 6.2 Economic incentives for adoption of mitigation strategies Economic incentives are vital to encourage farmers to adopt GHG mitigation strategies. Subsidies, tax breaks, and financial support for the adoption of sustainable practices can make a significant difference. For example, providing financial incentives for the use of organic fertilizers instead of synthetic nitrogen can help reduce net GHG emissions while maintaining or even improving rice yields (Shang et al., 2021). Similarly, promoting the use of drought-resistant rice varieties through economic incentives can help conserve water and reduce GHG emissions without compromising yield (Xu et al., 2015). These incentives can lower the initial cost barriers for farmers, making it more feasible for them to implement environmentally friendly practices. 6.3 Challenges and barriers to implementation Despite the potential benefits, several challenges and barriers hinder the implementation of GHG mitigation strategies in rice paddies. One major challenge is the trade-off between reducing CH₄ and increasing nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. For instance, while non-continuous flooding practices can significantly reduce CH₄ emissions, they may lead to an increase in N₂O emissions, complicating the overall GHG mitigation efforts. Additionally, the variability in soil and climate conditions can affect the effectiveness of different management practices, making it difficult to implement a one-size-fits-all solution (Zhao et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019). Economic constraints also pose a significant barrier, as the initial costs of adopting new technologies and practices can be prohibitive for many farmers. Furthermore, there is often a lack of awareness and technical knowledge among farmers about the benefits and methods of GHG mitigation, which can impede the adoption of these practices (Chen et al., 2021; Gupta et al., 2021). 7 Future Directions and Research Needs 7.1 Innovations in technology and practices Innovations in technology and practices are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 248 paddies. Several studies have highlighted the potential of various management practices to mitigate emissions. For instance, the adoption of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation has been shown to significantly reduce methane (CH₄) emissions by 25%~70% without increasing nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions (Chirinda et al., 2018). Additionally, the use of biochar and other soil amendments can further reduce GHG emissions while enhancing rice yields (Yagi et al., 2020). The development and implementation of drought-resistant rice varieties, such as HY3, have also demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining yields and reducing GHG emissions under water-saving irrigation strategies (Xu et al., 2015). Future research should focus on optimizing these practices and developing new technologies that can be easily adopted by farmers to achieve sustainable rice production. 7.2 Enhancing climate resilience in rice production Enhancing the climate resilience of rice production systems is essential to ensure food security while mitigating climate change. The integration of water-saving irrigation practices, such as intermittent irrigation and AWD, has shown promise in reducing GHG emissions and conserving water resources (Lansing et al., 2023). Moreover, the selection of high-yielding, low-emission rice varieties can significantly contribute to reducing the global warming potential (GWP) of rice cultivation (Zhang et al., 2019). It is also important to consider the local environmental and climatic conditions when implementing these practices, as their effectiveness can vary based on soil type, organic carbon content, and other factors (Jiang et al., 2019). Future research should aim to develop region-specific strategies that enhance the resilience of rice production systems to climate change. 7.3 Need for multi-disciplinary approaches Addressing the complex issue of GHG emissions from rice paddies requires a multi-disciplinary approach that integrates agronomy, soil science, climate science, and socio-economic factors. Studies have shown that changes in field management practices can balance the trade-offs between high yield and low emissions of GHGs (Shang et al., 2021). However, the interactions between different management practices and site-specific conditions need to be better understood to develop effective mitigation strategies (Zhao et al., 2019). Collaborative efforts among researchers, policymakers, and farmers are essential to identify and implement the most promising practices. Additionally, there is a need for comprehensive assessments that consider the overall GWP of different management practices and their socio-economic impacts (Hussain et al., 2015). Future research should focus on developing integrated approaches that address the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainable rice production. 8 Concluding Remarks Rice paddies are significant sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), contributing substantially to global emissions. Various studies have highlighted the critical factors influencing these emissions and potential mitigation strategies. For instance, rice paddies contribute around 30% and 11% of global agricultural CH4 and N₂O emissions, respectively, necessitating urgent mitigation strategies. The spatial and temporal dynamics of CH4 emissions are influenced by factors such as soil properties and climate conditions, with warming climates potentially enhancing CH4 emissions. Elevated CO2 levels have been shown to increase CH4 emissions from paddies, although the effects vary over time and between ecosystems. Management practices, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD), have demonstrated significant reductions in CH4 emissions without compromising rice yields. Additionally, the conversion of rice paddies to other agricultural systems, such as aquaculture, can also reduce GHG emissions. The role of rice plants themselves in mitigating CH4 emissions, particularly in high-emitting paddies, has been noted, suggesting that certain rice varieties could be more effective in reducing emissions. Mitigating GHG emissions from rice paddies is crucial for climate change adaptation and requires a multifaceted approach. Effective strategies include optimizing water management practices, such as AWD, which significantly reduce CH4 emissions while maintaining rice yields. Additionally, reducing nitrogen fertilizer application can lower N₂O emissions, contributing to overall GHG mitigation. The adoption of improved rice varieties that can suppress CH4 emissions further enhances the potential for sustainable rice production. Integrating remote sensing and biogeochemical modeling can provide accurate assessments of GHG emissions, aiding in the development of
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 249 region-specific mitigation strategies. Moreover, transitioning to alternative agricultural systems, such as aquaculture, offers a viable pathway to reduce emissions while potentially increasing agricultural income. Policymakers and regulatory bodies must prioritize these strategies to formulate effective policies that balance the need for food security with the imperative to mitigate climate change. Continued research and field studies are essential to refine these strategies and ensure their effectiveness across diverse environmental and agricultural contexts. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Miss Guo for critically reading the manuscript and providing valuable feedback. Conflict of Interest Disclosure The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. References Begum K., Kuhnert M., Yeluripati J., Ogle S., Parton W., Kader M., and Smith P., 2018, Model based regional estimates of soil organic carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas mitigation potentials from rice croplands in Bangladesh, Land, 7(3): 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND7030082 Chen H., Liao Q., and Liao Y., 2021, Response of area- and yield-scaled N2O emissions from croplands to deep fertilization: a meta-analysis of soil, climate, and management factors, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101(11): 4653-4661. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11108 Chirinda N., Arenas L., Katto M., Loaiza S., Corrêa F., Isthitani M., Loboguerrero A., Martínez-Barón D., Graterol E., Jaramillo S., Torres C., Arango M., Guzman M., Avila I., Hube S., Kurtz D., Zorrilla G., Terra J., Irisarri P., Tarlera S., LaHue G., Scivittaro W., Noguera A., and Bayer C., 2018, Sustainable and low greenhouse gas emitting rice production in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review on the transition from ideality to reality, Sustainability, 10(3): 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10030671 Cho S., Verma P., Das S., Kim G., Lim J., and Kim P., 2021, A new approach to suppress methane emissions from rice cropping systems using ethephon, Science of the Total Environment, 804: 150159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150159 Conrad R., 2020, Importance of hydrogenotrophic, aceticlastic and methylotrophic methanogenesis for methane production in terrestrial, aquatic and other anoxic environments: a mini review, Pedosphere, 30(1): 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(18)60052-9 Dheri G.S., and Nazir G., 2021, A review on carbon pools and sequestration as influenced by long-term management practices in a rice-wheat cropping system, Carbon Management, 12(5): 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1976674 Fan L., Dippold M., Ge T., Wu J., Thiel V., Kuzyakov Y., and Dorodnikov M., 2020, Anaerobic oxidation of methane in paddy soil: role of electron acceptors and fertilization in mitigating CH4 fluxes, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 141: 107685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107685 Gupta K., Kumar R., Baruah K., Hazarika S., Karmakar S., and Bordoloi N., 2021, Greenhouse gas emission from rice fields: a review from Indian context, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24): 30551-30572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13935-1 Haque A.N.A., Uddin M.K., Sulaiman M.F., Amin A.M., Hossain M., Aziz A.A., and Mosharrof M., 2021, Impact of organic amendment with alternate wetting and drying irrigation on rice yield, water use efficiency and physicochemical properties of soil, Agronomy, 11(8): 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081529 Hussain S., Peng S., Fahad S., Khaliq A., Huang J., Cui K., and Nie L., 2015, Rice management interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions: a review, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22: 3342-3360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3760-4 Ishfaq M., Farooq M., Zulfiqar U., Hussain S., Akbar N., Nawaz A., and Anjum S., 2020, Alternate wetting and drying: a water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system, Agricultural Water Management, 241: 106363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363 Islam S., Groenigen J., Jensen L., Sander B., and Neergaard A., 2018, The effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies without compromising yield by early-season drainage, Science of the Total Environment, 612: 1329-1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.022 Islam S., Sander B., Quilty J., Neergaard A., Groenigen J., and Jensen L., 2020, Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies, The Science of the total environment, 739: 140215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140215
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 250 Jiang Y., Carrijo D., Huang S., Chen J., Balaine N., Zhang W., Groenigen K., and Linquist B., 2019, Water management to mitigate the global warming potential of rice systems: a global meta-analysis, Field Crops Research, 234: 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FCR.2019.02.010 Jiang Y., Qian H., Wang L., Feng J., Huang S., Hungate B., Kessel C., Horwath W., Zhang X., Qin X., Li Y., Feng X., Zhang J., Deng A., Zheng C., Song Z., Hu S., Groenigen K., and Zhang W., 2018, Limited potential of harvest index improvement to reduce methane emissions from rice paddies, Global Change Biology, 25(2): 686-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14529 Kumar A., Nayak A., Das B., Panigrahi N., Dasgupta P., Mohanty S., Kumar U., Panneerselvam P., and Pathak H., 2019, Effects of water deficit stress on agronomic and physiological responses of rice and greenhouse gas emission from rice soil under elevated atmospheric CO2, Science of the Total Environment, 650: 2032-2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.332 Lansing J., Kremer J., Suryawan I., Sathiakumar S., Jacobs G., Chung N., and Wiguna I., 2023, Adaptive irrigation management by Balinese farmers reduces greenhouse gas emissions and increases rice yields, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1889): 20220400. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0400 Liang K.W., 2024, Enhancing the efficiency of converting agricultural waste into biomethane using anaerobic digestion technology, Journal of Energy Bioscience, 15(2): 118-131. https://doi.org/10.5376/jeb.2024.15.0012 Linquist B., Groenigen K., Adviento-Borbe M., Pittelkow C., and Kessel C., 2012, An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops, Global Change Biology, 18(1): 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x Liu S., Hu Z., Wu S., Li S., Li Z., and Zou J., 2016, Methane and nitrous oxide emissions reduced following conversion of rice paddies to inland crab-fish aquaculture in Southeast China, Environmental Science & Technology, 50(2): 633-642. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04343 Malumpong C., Ruensuk N., Rossopa B., Channu C., Intarasathit W., Wongboon W., Poathong K., and Kunket K., 2020, Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) in broadcast rice (Oryza sativa L.) management to maintain yield, conserve water, and reduce gas emissions in Thailand, Agricultural Research, 10: 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00483-2 Malyan S., Bhatia A., Kumar A., Gupta D., Singh R., Kumar S., Tomer R., Kumar O., and Jain N., 2016, Methane production, oxidation and mitigation: A mechanistic understanding and comprehensive evaluation of influencing factors, Science of the Total Environment, 572: 874-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.182 Oda M., and Chiếm N., 2019, Rice plants reduce methane emissions in high-emitting paddies, F1000Research, 7: 1349. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15859.2 Runkle B., Suvočarev K., Reba M., Reavis C., Smith S., Chiu Y., and Fong B., 2018, Methane emission reductions from the alternate wetting and drying of rice fields detected using the eddy covariance method, Environmental Science & Technology, 53(2): 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05535 Shang Z., Abdalla M., Xia L., Zhou F., Sun W., and Smith P., 2021, Can cropland management practices lower net greenhouse emissions without compromising yield? Global Change Biology, 27(19): 4657-4670. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15796 Sriphirom P., Chidthaisong A., and Towprayoon S., 2019, Effect of alternate wetting and drying water management on rice cultivation with low emissions and low water used during wet and dry season, Journal of Cleaner Production, 223: 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.03.212 Sriphirom P., Chidthaisong A., Yagi K., Tripetchkul S., and Towprayoon S., 2020, Evaluation of biochar applications combined with alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water management in rice field as a methane mitigation option for farmers’ adoption, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66(1): 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1706431 Sun W.J., and Qian Q.S.,2024, Long-term effects of rice cultivation on soil organic nitrogen dynamics, Rice Genomics and Genetics, 15(4): 203-211. https://doi.org/10.5376/rgg.2024.15.0020 Sun W., Xiao E., Pu Z., Krumins V., Dong Y., Li B., and Hu M., 2018, Paddy soil microbial communities driven by environment- and microbe-microbe interactions: A case study of elevation-resolved microbial communities in a rice terrace, Science of the Total Environment, 612: 884-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.275 Thanuja K., and Karthikeyan S., 2020, Exploring bio-mitigation strategies to reduce carbon footprint in wetland paddy system, Bioresource Technology Reports, 12: 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100557 Wang H., Zhang Y., Zhang Y., McDaniel M., Sun L., Su W., Fan X., Liu S., and Xiao X., 2020, Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies-with both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency, Agricultural Water Management, 228: 105889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105889 Wu Z., Zhang X., Dong Y., Li B., Li B., and Xiong Z., 2019, Biochar amendment reduced greenhouse gas intensities in the rice-wheat rotation system: six-year field observation and meta-analysis, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 278: 107625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107625
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 243-251 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 251 Xu Y., Ge J., Tian S., Li S., Nguy-Robertson A., Zhan M., and Cao C., 2015, Effects of water-saving irrigation practices and drought resistant rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions from a no-till paddy in the central lowlands of China, Science of the Total Environment, 505: 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.073 Yagi K., Sriphirom P., Cha-un N., Fusuwankaya K., Chidthaisong A., Damen B., and Towprayoon S., 2020, Potential and promisingness of technical options for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from rice cultivation in Southeast Asian countries, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66(1): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1683890 Zhang Y., Jiang Y., Tai A., Feng J., Li Z., Zhu X., Chen J., Zhang J., Song Z., Deng A., Lal R., and Zhang W., 2019, Contribution of rice variety renewal and agronomic innovations to yield improvement and greenhouse gas mitigation in China, Environmental Research Letters, 14(11): 114020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab488d Zhao X., Liu S., Pu C., Zhang X., Xue J., Zhang R., Wang Y., Lal R., Zhang H., and Chen F., 2016, Methane and nitrous oxide emissions under no‐till farming in China: a meta‐analysis, Global Change Biology, 22(4): 1372-1384. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13185 Zhao X., Pu C., Ma S., Liu S., Xue J., Wang X., Wang Y., Li S., Lal R., Chen F., and Zhang H., 2019, Management-induced greenhouse gases emission mitigation in global rice production, Science of the Total Environment, 649: 1299-1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.392
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 252-260 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 252 Research Insight Open Access Comparative Genomics of Lupinus Species: Implications for Crop Improvement Dandan Huang Hainan Institute of Biotechnology, Haikou, 570206, Hainan, China Corresponding email: dandan.huang@hibio.org Field Crop, 2024, Vol.7, No.5 doi: 10.5376/fc.2024.07.0025 Received: 08 Jul., 2024 Accepted: 19 Aug., 2024 Published: 09 Sep., 2024 Copyright © 2024 Huang, This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Preferred citation for this article: Huang D.D., 2024, Comparative genomics of Lupinus species: implications for crop improvement, Field Crop, 7(5): 252-260 (doi: 10.5376/fc.2024.07.0025) Abstract Lupinus species, with their agricultural and ecological importance, have attracted growing interest in genomic research due to their potential for crop improvement. Comparative genomics offers insights into the genetic diversity and adaptability of Lupinus species, paving the way for enhanced breeding programs. This study focuses on analyzing the genomic diversity within the Lupinus genus and applying comparative genomic approaches to uncover key genetic features relevant to agronomic traits, such as drought resistance, nutritional enhancement, and disease resistance. Through the use of advanced genomic tools, including sequencing technologies and gene-editing methods like CRISPR, this study provides an in-depth look into how genetic variations across different Lupinus species can be leveraged for crop improvement. A case study on Lupinus albus highlights the practical application of these insights, emphasizing the potential for region-specific improvements. Despite current challenges in Lupinus genomics, this study suggests strategies to overcome these hurdles and outlines future directions for advancing crop improvement through comparative genomics. Keywords Lupinus species; Comparative genomics; Crop improvement; Genetic diversity; Genomic tools 1 Introduction Lupinus species, commonly known as lupins, are significant grain legume crops that play a crucial role in sustainable farming systems. They are known for their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen, which reduces the need for synthetic fertilizers and improves soil health (Hane et al., 2016). Lupins are also valued for their high protein and dietary fiber content, making them a nutritious food source for both humans and livestock (Valente et al., 2023). The adaptability of lupins to a wide range of edaphoclimatic conditions further enhances their agricultural importance, allowing them to thrive in environments where other crops may not be viable (Martin et al., 2014; Msaddak et al., 2023). Genomics, the study of an organism's complete set of DNA, including all of its genes, has revolutionized crop improvement by providing insights into the genetic basis of important traits (Zhou and Chen, 2024). Advances in genomic technologies, such as whole genome sequencing and the development of genetic linkage maps, have enabled researchers to identify genes associated with key agronomic traits, such as disease resistance, yield, and stress tolerance (Yang et al., 2013; Garg et al., 2022). In lupins, genomic studies have revealed significant information about their evolutionary history, gene families, and the mechanisms underlying their unique traits, such as nonmycorrhizal phosphorus acquisition and nitrogen fixation (Lambers et al., 2013; Czyż et al., 2020). These insights are critical for developing improved lupin cultivars with enhanced productivity and resilience. This study conducts a comparative genomic analysis of various species of Lupinus to identify genetic factors for crop improvement, uncovering candidate genes associated with desirable traits such as high protein content, disease resistance, and environmental adaptability, including the sequencing and analysis of the Lupinus genome, identification of key genetic markers, and exploration of gene expression patterns related to important agronomic traits, with the aim of providing valuable genomic resources to accelerate Lupinus breeding programs and contribute to the development of superior Lupinus varieties for sustainable agriculture. 2 Genomic Diversity inLupinus Species 2.1 Overview of the Lupinus genus and its species The Lupinus genus, commonly known as lupins, comprises a diverse group of leguminous plants known for their high protein content and adaptability to various environmental conditions. Lupins are cultivated globally, with
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 252-260 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 253 species such as Lupinus angustifolius (narrow-leafed lupin), Lupinus albus (white lupin), and Lupinus mutabilis (Andean lupin) being of significant agricultural importance. These species are valued not only for their nutritional benefits but also for their role in sustainable farming practices, such as nitrogen fixation and soil improvement (Guilengue et al., 2019; Msaddak et al., 2023). 2.2 Genetic diversity and its role in adaptation Genetic diversity within Lupinus species plays a crucial role in their ability to adapt to different environmental conditions. For instance, Lupinus mutabilis exhibits significant genetic and phenotypic variability, which is essential for its adaptation to Mediterranean climates and other regions outside its native Andean environment (Figure 1) (Gulisano et al., 2022). Similarly, the genetic diversity observed in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) has been pivotal in its domestication and adaptation to various photoperiods and vernalization requirements (Taylor et al., 2018; Rychel-Bielska et al., 2020). The presence of diverse genetic traits, such as flowering time and yield components, enables the selection of accessions suited to specific environments, thereby enhancing crop performance and resilience (Gulisano et al., 2023). Figure 1 Principal component analysis of L. mutabilis collection, including 201 lines from the INIAP gene bank (Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, unknown, and Belarus), Andino, and 24 lines from breeding programs in Europe (Germany and Portugal). Each biplot shows the PCA scores of the explanatory variables (as vectors) and individuals (as points) separately for each of the environments tested: (A) Ecuador, (B) Portugal, (C) NL-Sc and (D) NL-Wi. Individuals on the same side as a given variable should be interpreted as having a high contribution to it. The color of the explanatory variables (vectors) shows the strength of their contribution to each PC. The five most high-yielding genotypes for each location are indicated on the graph with a black label. The accessions with the higher biomass yield in European trials are indicated in red (Adopted from Gulisano et al., 2022) 2.3 Comparative genomics: current research and findings Recent advances in comparative genomics have provided deeper insights into the genomic diversity and evolutionary history of Lupinus species. The development of a chromosome-length reference genome and pan-genome assembly for narrow-leafed lupin has revealed significant genomic variations, including the absence of essential mycorrhizal-associated genes and the presence of key alkaloid regulatory genes (Garg et al., 2022). Comparative studies between Lupinus species and other legumes have highlighted unique genomic features, such as the loss of mycorrhiza-specific genes in narrow-leafed lupin, which distinguishes it from other legumes (Hane et al., 2016).
Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.5, 252-260 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 254 Furthermore, epigenomic studies have uncovered variations in chromatin modifications and DNA methylation patterns among different Lupinus species, providing insights into their evolutionary processes and gene expression regulation (Susek et al., 2017). These findings underscore the importance of genomic and epigenomic diversity in the adaptation and evolution of Lupinus species, offering valuable resources for crop improvement and breeding programs. The principal component analysis (PCA) depicted provides insights into the genetic diversity and performance of Lupinus mutabilis accessions across different environments. The distribution of accessions in relation to traits like seed yield, biomass, and pod formation highlights the variability in response to specific environments, such as Ecuador, Portugal, and northern Europe. Accessions with higher biomass yields in European trials are marked in red, demonstrating their potential for breeding programs aimed at improving yield under European conditions. This analysis helps in identifying traits and genotypes that are well-suited for specific climates and farming systems. 3 Comparative Genomics inLupinus 3.1 Methods used in comparative genomics for Lupinus Comparative genomics in Lupinus species has employed a variety of advanced techniques to elucidate genetic differences and similarities. Key methods include genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which have been used to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with important agronomic traits in Lupinus mutabilis. Whole-genome sequencing and pan-genome assembly have also been pivotal, as demonstrated by the creation of a chromosome-length reference genome for narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) and the comparison with white lupin (Lupinus albus). Additionally, epigenomic studies using immunostaining of methylated histone H3 and DNA methylation, as well as whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, have provided insights into the epigenetic landscape of various Lupinus species (Susek et al., 2017). Transcriptome sequencing and the development of expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries have further facilitated comparative studies and marker development (Parra-González et al., 2012). 3.2 Key genomic features identified in different Lupinus species Several key genomic features have been identified across different Lupinus species. In Lupinus angustifolius, the discovery of natural mutations conferring vernalization independence, such as the Ku and Jul alleles, has been significant for understanding flowering time regulation (Figure 2) (Rychel-Bielska et al., 2020). The genome of L. angustifolius also revealed the absence of essential mycorrhizal-associated genes, which is unique among legumes. In Lupinus luteus, comparative mapping has highlighted syntenic regions with major orthologous genes controlling anthracnose resistance and flowering time, suggesting the presence of orthologous genes for these traits in the L. luteus genome. For Lupinus mutabilis, genetic and genomic diversity studies have identified significant intra-specific variability, which is crucial for breeding and conservation programs (Guilengue et al., 2019). Additionally, genome-wide association studies in L. mutabilis have pinpointed QTLs linked to vegetative yield, plant height, pods number, and flowering time (Gulisano et al., 2023). 3.3 Implications of genetic variations for crop improvement The genetic variations identified in Lupinus species have profound implications for crop improvement. The identification of vernalization-independent alleles in L. angustifolius can lead to the development of early-flowering varieties, which are advantageous for different climatic conditions. The absence of mycorrhizal-associated genes in L. angustifolius suggests a unique adaptation mechanism that could be exploited for breeding programs aimed at enhancing nutrient uptake efficiency (Garg et al., 2022). The syntenic regions identified in L. luteus for anthracnose resistance and flowering time can be targeted for marker-assisted selection to develop disease-resistant and early-flowering cultivars (Lichtin et al., 2020). The genetic diversity observed in L. mutabilis provides a rich resource for selecting high-yielding and well-adapted varieties for European climates, thereby expanding its cultivation beyond its native Andean region (Gulisano et al., 2022). Overall, these genetic insights facilitate the development of improved Lupinus varieties with enhanced yield, disease resistance, and adaptability to diverse environmental conditions.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==