Field Crop 2024, Vol.7, No.2, 105-115 http://cropscipublisher.com/index.php/fc 111 7.2 Analysis of the outcomes The results of the study indicated significant differences in weedy rice infestation and rice yield among the different establishment methods. The farmers' practice had the highest number of weedy rice panicles, ranging from 60 to 80 panicles per square meter. In contrast, the transplanted rice method had the lowest number of weedy rice panicles, ranging from 1.3 to 3.0 panicles per square meter. The random broadcast method reduced weedy rice seed production by 29%~41% compared to the farmers' practice, while the seedling broadcast method reduced it by 71%~87%, and the transplanted rice method by 95%~98% (Kim et al., 2000). In terms of rice yield, the farmers' practice resulted in the lowest grain yield, ranging from 5.1 to 6.7 tons per hectare. The random broadcast and row seeding methods increased rice yield by up to 21% and 31%, respectively, compared to the farmers' practice. The seedling broadcast method increased rice yield by 27%~49%, and the transplanted rice method achieved the highest yield, ranging from 7.5 to 9.1 tons per hectare (Kim et al., 2000). 7.3 Lessons learned from the case study Recent research provides several important lessons for managing weedy rice. This method was the most effective in reducing weedy rice infestation and increasing rice yield. The significant reduction in weedy rice panicles and the highest grain yield achieved suggest that transplanting rice can be a highly effective cultural practice for managing weedy rice (Kim et al., 2000). The random broadcast method, which involved the use of clean rice seeds, significantly reduced weedy rice seed production. This highlights the importance of using clean seeds to prevent the spread of weedy rice (Kim et al., 2000). These methods also showed considerable reductions in weedy rice infestation and increases in rice yield. They can be viable alternatives to the farmers' practice, especially in areas where transplanting is not feasible (Kim et al., 2000). The study underscores the importance of integrating multiple cultural practices, such as the use of clean seeds, different planting methods, and proper field management, to effectively manage weedy rice and enhance rice yield (Kim et al., 2000). By adopting these cultural weed management strategies, farmers can reduce the infestation of weedy rice, improve rice yield, and potentially reduce the reliance on chemical herbicides, thereby promoting more sustainable rice cultivation practices. 8 Challenges and Limitations 8.1 Practical challenges in adopting cultural weed management strategies Adopting cultural weed management strategies in rice cultivation presents several practical challenges. One significant issue is the labor-intensive nature of these practices. For instance, methods such as hand weeding and the use of mechanical tools like conoweeders require substantial manual effort, which can be a deterrent for farmers, especially in regions facing labor shortages (Kim et al., 2000; Dass et al., 2016). Additionally, the transition from traditional transplanting to direct-seeded rice (DSR) systems, which is often recommended for better weed management, can be difficult due to the need for new skills and knowledge among farmers (Shekhawat et al., 2020). The effectiveness of cultural practices such as crop rotation, stale seedbed preparation, and the use of allelopathic rice varieties also depends heavily on precise timing and local environmental conditions, which can vary widely and be unpredictable (Kong et al., 2008). 8.2 Limitations and potential drawbacks of these practices Cultural weed management strategies, while beneficial, have inherent limitations and potential drawbacks. One major limitation is their partial effectiveness; these methods often do not completely eliminate weed infestations but rather reduce them to manageable levels. For example, higher seeding rates and narrow row spacing can reduce weed biomass but may not fully control all weed species (Dass et al., 2016). Additionally, practices like flooding and delayed seeding can be effective but are not always feasible due to water availability and climatic conditions (Tiwari et al., 2023). The use of allelopathic rice varieties, although promising, may not be universally effective against all weed species and can sometimes lead to reduced crop yields if not managed properly (Kong et al., 2008). Furthermore, the integration of these practices with low-dose herbicide applications, while reducing chemical use, still involves some reliance on herbicides, which may not be acceptable to all farmers or consumers (Kong et al., 2008; Tiwari et al., 2023).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODY0NQ==