MSB_2024v15n1

Molecular Soil Biology 2024, Vol.15, No.1, 28-36 http://bioscipublisher.com/index.php/msb 32 have revealed the diversity and functional potential of endophytic and rhizospheric diazotrophs in sugarcane, highlighting their role in nitrogen fixation and plant growth promotion (Singh et al., 2022; Luo et al., 2023). By characterizing the microbial communities in different sugarcane tissues, researchers have identified key bacterial families and genera that contribute to SNF and stress resilience (Singh et al., 2022). These insights enable the development of targeted microbial inoculants and the optimization of microbial consortia for enhanced SNF and crop productivity (Luo et al., 2023). Table 1 Effect of P. korensis CY4 and P. entomophila CN11 strains inoculation on the sugarcane growth parameters (Adopted from Singh et al., 2023) Parameters Days Sugarcane varieties GT11 GXB9 Control CY4 CN11 Control CY4 CN11 Chlorophyll (SPAD units) 30 14.30 ± 0.26b 16.78 ± 0.31a 15.84 ± 0.29a 15.41 ± 0.28c 17.59 ± 0.32a 16.69 ± 0.31b Leaf area (cm2) 375.63 ± 6.90c 575.36 ± 10.58b 624.50 ± 11.48a 428.91 ± 7.88c 614.39 ± 11.29b 670.67 ± 12.33a Plant height (cm) 25.09 ± 0.46c 32.06 ± 0.30b 34.58 ± 0.40a 22.06 ± 0.41c 25.07 ± 0.37b 29.07 ± 0.35a Root Weight (g) 2.70 ± 0.050b 2.90 ± 0.035a 2.85 ± 0.044a 1.41 ± 0.63b 2.42 ± 0.04a 2.30 ± 0.04a Shoot weight (g) 15.47 ± 0.36c 18.83 ± 0.16a 17.44 ± 0.20b 18.85 ± 0.27c 29.73 ± 0.18b 30.83 ± 0.81a Chlorophyll (SPAD units) 60 31.14 ± 0.57c 38.03 ± 0.70a 33.18 ± 0.61b 29.02 ± 0.66c 33.58 ± 0.62b 35.54 ± 0.60a Leaf area (cm2) 540.37 ± 13.61b 760.07 ± 12.13a 751.48 ± 13.81a 606.63 ± 12.99c 753.16 ± 13.84b 853.60 ± 15.69a Plant height (cm) 34.16 ± 0.83c 46.15 ± 0.77b 48.08 ± 0.42a 37.13 ± 0.68c 43.15 ± 0.79b 48.13 ± 0.70a Root weight (g) 4.11 ± 0.076c 6.02 ± 0.111a 5.91 ± 0.072b 3.23 ± 0.151c 4.62 ± 0.085a 4.22 ± 0.077b Shoot weight (g) 51.58 ± 0.95c 65.23 ± 1.20a 59.10 ± 0.54b 32.59 ± 0.97c 57.50 ± 1.06a 55.65 ± 0.78b Chlorophyll (SPAD units) 90 29.37 ± 0.54c 35.12 ± 0.65a 33.85 ± 0.62b 34.05 ± 0.63c 37.80 ± 0.69b 41.21 ± 0.76a Leaf area (cm2) 938.35 ± 17.25c 1270.07 ± 23.35a 1177.26 ± 21.64b 750.47 ± 13.80c 1276.65 ± 23.47b 1399.87 ± 25.73a Plant height (cm) 65.23 ± 1.20c 78.27 ± 1.44a 76.23 ± 1.22b 54.22 ± 1.18c 70.24 ± 0.19b 72.34 ± 1.29a Root weight (g) 6.28 ± 0.41c 9.84 ± 0.18a 8.43 ± 0.13b 5.15 ± 0.79c 7.49 ± 0.46b 8.97 ± 0.09a Shoot weight (g) 86.30 ± 2.14b 117.50 ± 2.17a 118.04 ± 1.80a 82.59 ± 1.52c 138.12 ± 3.28a 117.41 ± 2.18b 4.3 Integration of advanced microbiome technologies Advanced microbiome technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing and metagenomics, have revolutionized our understanding of the complex interactions between plants and their associated microbial communities. Studies have revealed the diversity and functional potential of endophytic and rhizospheric diazotrophs in sugarcane, highlighting their role in nitrogen fixation and plant growth promotion (Singh et al., 2022; Luo et al., 2023). By characterizing the microbial communities in different sugarcane tissues, researchers have identified key bacterial families and genera that contribute to SNF and stress resilience (Singh et al., 2022). These insights enable the development of targeted microbial inoculants and the optimization of microbial consortia for enhanced SNF and crop productivity (Luo et al., 2023). 5 Case Study 5.1 Detailed examination of a successful implementation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in sugarcane production The case study by Martins et al. (2020) provides a comprehensive analysis of the successful implementation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) in sugarcane production. This study highlights the potential of SNF to enhance sugarcane yield, improve soil health, and offer economic benefits by reducing the dependency on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzMg==