Bioscience Methods 2024, Vol.15, No.5, 226-236 http://bioscipublisher.com/index.php/bm 230 selection (MAS) (Guo et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2022). Additionally, the complexity of the maize genome, with its high level of duplication and repetitive sequences, can impede the development of true single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, further complicating the accuracy of genetic markers (Mammadov et al., 2014). The genetic diversity and complexity of maize present another significant challenge. Maize breeding programs often deal with a wide range of genetic backgrounds, which can affect the performance and reliability of genetic markers. For example, the genetic structure of early and extra-early maturing maize germplasm in sub-Saharan Africa is highly complex, making it difficult to classify inbred lines into heterotic groups solely based on molecular markers (Badu‐Apraku et al., 2021). This complexity necessitates the use of comprehensive genotyping and phenotyping to ensure accurate selection and breeding outcomes (Romay et al., 2013; Gedil and Menkir, 2019). 4.2 Cost and resource limitations The integration of genetic markers into breeding programs requires significant infrastructure and resources. High-throughput genotyping platforms, such as those used for developing SNP marker panels, demand advanced laboratory facilities and technical expertise (Guo et al., 2019). The cost of these technologies, although decreasing, can still be prohibitive, especially for large-scale breeding programs. Additionally, the need for extensive field trials and phenotyping to validate marker effectiveness adds to the resource burden (Cooper et al., 2014). Small and medium-sized breeding companies face unique challenges in adopting genetic marker technologies. The high initial investment in infrastructure and the ongoing costs of genotyping and phenotyping can be a significant barrier. However, affordable genotyping platforms like GBTS have shown promise in making marker-assisted breeding more accessible to these companies (Guo et al., 2019). Despite this, the integration of these technologies into existing breeding programs requires substantial training and capacity building, which can be a limiting factor for smaller enterprises (Gedil and Menkir, 2019). 4.3 Social and ethical issues The use of genetic markers in breeding programs often intersects with the broader debate on genetic modification (GM). While marker-assisted selection does not necessarily involve the creation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the public perception of genetic technologies can influence the acceptance and adoption of these methods. Concerns about the safety and ethical implications of genetic modification can lead to resistance from consumers and regulatory bodies, impacting the implementation of marker-assisted breeding (Chen et al., 2022). There are also concerns about the environmental impact of using genetic markers in breeding programs. The introduction of new traits through marker-assisted selection can potentially affect biodiversity and ecosystem balance. For instance, the development of drought-tolerant maize hybrids involves the integration of multiple traits, which could have unforeseen ecological consequences (Cooper et al., 2014). Ensuring that these breeding practices do not negatively impact the environment requires careful consideration and ongoing monitoring. In conclusion, while the integration of genetic markers in maize breeding programs offers significant potential for improving crop traits and productivity, it is accompanied by a range of challenges. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that includes technical innovation, resource investment, and consideration of social and ethical implications. By navigating these complexities, breeding programs can harness the full potential of genetic markers to achieve sustainable agricultural advancements. 5 Case Studies and Success Stories 5.1 Quality protein maize (QPM) breeding programs Quality Protein Maize (QPM) has been a significant breakthrough in addressing protein malnutrition, particularly in developing countries. The genetic basis of QPM involves the opaque-2 (o2) mutation, which increases lysine and tryptophan content in maize endosperm. However, the initial o2 mutation resulted in undesirable agronomic traits such as soft, chalky kernels that were prone to damage and poor germination. To overcome these challenges,
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==