Bioscience Method 2024, Vol.15, No.2, 76-88 http://bioscipublisher.com/index.php/bm 86 biological contexts. This suggests a promising avenue for future research that explores the intersection of genetic algorithms and artificial intelligence to address complex optimization problems across various domains. Given the promising results obtained thus far, there is a clear need for continued research and interdisciplinary collaboration to fully realize the potential of genetic improvement techniques. Future research should focus on refining genome editing technologies, improving the accuracy and efficiency of genetic modifications, and exploring the ethical and regulatory implications of deploying these technologies in both agricultural and non-agricultural settings. Additionally, collaborative efforts that bring together geneticists, computer scientists, agronomists, and policymakers will be essential in developing robust frameworks for the safe and effective application of genetic improvement strategies. Advancing our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of engineered SynComs will also be crucial for their successful integration into natural and agricultural ecosystems. This requires comprehensive studies that investigate the long-term stability and ecological impact of SynComs, as well as the development of novel methods for monitoring and managing these microbial communities. In conclusion, genetic improvement techniques hold great promise for enhancing the performance and resilience of both biological and software systems. Continued research, supported by interdisciplinary collaboration, will be key to unlocking the full potential of these technologies and addressing the pressing challenges of our time. Acknowledgments I sincerely thank Dr.Cheng to you for the help in my writing process. I would like to thank two anonymous peer reviewers who have benefited greatly from their professional guidance and valuable advice. Conflict of Interest Disclosure The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Reference Abreu N.A., and Taga M.E., 2016, Decoding molecular interactions in microbial communities, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 40(5): 648-663. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw019 Backer R., Rokem J.S., Ilangumaran G., Lamont J., Praslickova D., Ricci E., and Smith D.L., 2018, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture, Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473 Bandara C.D., Singh S., Afara I.O., Wolff A., Tesfamichael T., Travares D.A., and Ostrikov K., 2020, Resolving bio-nano interactions of escherichia coli bacteria on dragonfly wing nanostructures using helium ion microscopy, Journal of Applied Physics, 127(18): 184701. Bikel S., Valdez-Lara A., Cornejo-Granados F., Rico K., Canizales-Quinteros S., Soberón X., Del Pozo-Yauner L., and Ochoa-Leyva A., 2015, Combining metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics to explore novel microbial interactions: towards a systems-level understanding of human microbiome, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 13: 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.06.001 Braga R.M., Dourado M.N., and Araújo W.L., 2016, Microbial interactions: ecology in a molecular perspective, Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 47: 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.005 Cameron D.E., Bashor C.J., and Collins J.J., 2014, A brief history of synthetic biology, Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12(5): 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3239 de Souza R.S.D., Armanhi J.S.L., and Arruda P., 2020, Designing synthetic microbial communities for improved crop resiliency, Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 1179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01179 Deng Y., 2020, Application of synthetic microbial consortia in bioremediation, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 86(14): 494-520. Eng A., and Borenstein E., 2019, Microbial community design: methods, applications, and opportunities, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 58: 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.03.002 Frankel A.E., Deshmukh S., Wolf R.A., and Klampfer L., 2021, Engineered gut microbiota: synthetic microbial consortia for precision cancer immunotherapy, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 131(4): e140626. Green S., 2015, Can biological complexity be reverse engineered, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 53: 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.03.008 Heinken A., and Thiele I., 2015, Anoxic conditions promote species-specific mutualism between gut microbes in silico, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81: 4049-4061. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00101-15
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODY0NQ==