MPB-2016v7n2 - page 6

Molecular Plant Breeding 2016, Vol.7, No.02, 1
-
6
3
are stable in research based on Francis and
Kannenberg’s (Francis and Kannenberg, 1978) figures.
The Arena and Pomar cultivars, respectively, with the
highest coefficient of variation and the expression
showed the lowest stability.
Eco Valance Rick and Shukla variance statistics the
second represents the stability of Lin et al (Lin et al.,
1986) respectively. Based on the results of the
variance Shukla, Terra, Vidoc and Alisson cultivars,
respectively, the cultivars are stable, according to the
minimum variance Shukla.
Lin and Binns (Lin and Binns, 1988) proposed
location between the mean-square methods. They
calculated the stability of the isolated location.
Coefficient of variation in space Lin and Binns (Lin
and Bins, 1991) is presented as the fourth parameter
type (Table 2).
Table 1 combined analysis of variance sunflower cultivars studied in 4 locations
Mean square
Sum of the squares
Degree of freedom
Sources of variations
53678488.4
**
161035465.2
3
locations
434174.8
5210097.3
12
E1
1741206.9
**
26118104.2
15
Genotype
2341206.9
**
10660190.4
45
Location ×genotype
103866.2
18695924.7
180
E2
221719781.7
255
Total
CV:10.54
Note: **, *, Ns, respectively, indicating no significant difference statistically significant at the 5 and 1 percent level
Table 2 the results based on the analysis of univariate methods For sunflower genotypes studied (yield)
genotypes
Average
performance
genotype
Variance stability
Ecco variance
Rick
Coefficient
Variation
Coefficient of
variation in the
location
Alexandra
3248.66
28765.49
3.24
28.006
332704.7
Alisson
3060.72
13534.92
1.74
33.25
462819.8
Almanzor
3107.53
169562
17.11
35.97
535143.99
Altesse
3108.83
30623.16
3.43
29.39
370894.9
Arena
3147.98
82328.47
8.52
36.63
430568.98
Azargol
3935.05
124942.97
12.72
23.89
1641.12
Brocar
3133.05
44954.01
4.84
22.7
380676.5
Euroflor
2814.75
232289.2
23.29
31.57
673017.95
Fabiola
3209.4
41347.39
4.48
34.33
351507.1
Joana
2619.5
37065.59
4.06
32.38
909614.8
Mas96a
2684.31
21413.59
2.52
30.07
875626.4
Melody
3174.29
52208.69
5.55
31.29
408156.1
Nkarmoni
3273.14
30175.68
3.38
23.5
258896.9
Pomar
2906.59
22852.28
2.66
36.7
595117.6
Terra
2505.08
3926.5
0.8
33.23
1092436.05
Vidoc
2983.35
11586.27
1.55
30.96
541668.3
2.2 Stability analysis of genotypes based on
regression analysis
The Arena and Fabiola cultivars are with regression
coefficient close to an above-average yield and
average stability and compatibility good. Altesse
cultivar is with regression coefficient close to a below
average performance and general stability and
compatibility poor average. Also, Melody cultivar is
with regression coefficient close to a near-average
yield with moderate stability and consistency the
average public. Euroflor and Joana cultivars are with
regression coefficient close to a below average
performance and general stability and compatibility
poor average. The regression model coefficient of
determination (or diagnosis), which has been proposed
to improve decision-making based on regression The
1,2,3,4,5 7,8,9,10
Powered by FlippingBook